2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00916.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of density‐dependent growth in juvenile stream‐dwelling salmonids

Abstract: Literature data for 19 populations from 16 different studies of six species of stream-dwelling salmonids were analysed to test the hypothesis that density-dependent growth is stronger at low rather than at high population density. Fifteen of 19 populations showed evidence of a significant decrease in growth rate with increasing density. In 11 of these 15 populations, the pattern of density-dependent growth was better described by a negative power curve than by a linear regression (i.e. Akaike Information Crite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
153
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, local fish density had negative effects on juvenile coho growth rate, confirming the importance of densitydependent growth in stream-dwelling salmonid populations (Jenkins et al 1999, Grant andImre 2005). Secondly, the negative growth effect we observed occurred at relatively low fish densities (;0.02-0.9 fish/m 2 ), a pattern observed in other studies (see Jenkins et al 1999).…”
Section: Field Studysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, local fish density had negative effects on juvenile coho growth rate, confirming the importance of densitydependent growth in stream-dwelling salmonid populations (Jenkins et al 1999, Grant andImre 2005). Secondly, the negative growth effect we observed occurred at relatively low fish densities (;0.02-0.9 fish/m 2 ), a pattern observed in other studies (see Jenkins et al 1999).…”
Section: Field Studysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Possibly exacerbating this scenario is the release of hatchery fish, which is commonly used to augment salmon populations (e.g., Einum et al 2009). Artificial supplementation of fish populations or other species has clear benefits when they face immediate risk of extinction (Young 1999), but in resource-limited systems it may have negative demographic consequences for wild populations because territorial species, such as stream-dwelling salmonids, are strongly affected by density-dependent interactions (our study, Jenkins et al 1999, Grant and Imre 2005, Buhle et al 2009, Einum et al 2009). …”
Section: Synthesis and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although we did survey resident fish densities in three years and observed little among year variation (Appendix A), these years happened to coincide with lower than average salmon densities in both streams. Thus, it is possible that densities of resident fish were higher in Lynx and Hidden creeks when salmon densities were higher leading to density-dependent growth, a phenomenon widely reported in stream-dwelling salmonid populations (Bohlin et al 2002, Grant andImre 2005). Unfortunately, due to high variation in growth rates among individual fish captured at the same salmon density and the limited number of data from years around the inflection point, we were unable to predict the exact density where superimposition occurred with high confidence (Appendix D: Table D1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The first is through direct effects on growth and survival, mediated through competition for food and space (Grant and Imre 2005;Keeley 2001). Theoretically, increased competition for food resources decreases growth and size, in turn leading to a higher number of ocean migrants within a population (Hendry et al 2004;Jonsson and Jonsson 1993 ; Fig.…”
Section: Density Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%