2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Both local control and regional/distant metastasis-free survival were also improved. 2 Remarkably, these patient benefits did not come at the cost of additional short-or long-term toxicity. 2,3 However, radiation oncologists' ability to identify prostate tumors on MRI is critical to harnessing the benefits of radiotherapy boost for patients.…”
Section: Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1 Both local control and regional/distant metastasis-free survival were also improved. 2 Remarkably, these patient benefits did not come at the cost of additional short-or long-term toxicity. 2,3 However, radiation oncologists' ability to identify prostate tumors on MRI is critical to harnessing the benefits of radiotherapy boost for patients.…”
Section: Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Toxicity and QoL were favorable in both arms, and differences were small a not statistically significant. Likewise, a patterns of failure analysis of the FLAME trial demonstrated focal boost decreased both local and regional or distant metastatic failure ( 29 ). Although there was also a clear inverse relationship between achieved dose to the GTV and probability of biochemical failure, there appears to be saturation as the curve starts to plateau beyond 85–90 Gy (96–106 EQD2, α/β of 1.2) ( 28 ).…”
Section: Dose Escalation For High-risk Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the technical achievement of focal dose escalation to this extreme is commendable, it is unclear whether the risk of increased toxicity is justified from an oncological perspective. The recently published FLAME trial patterns-of-failure analysis suggests that there are diminishing returns to dose escalation to the DIL in excess of 100 Gy EQD2 (α/β of 1.2), both in terms of local failure and regional/distant metastatic failure ( 29 ).…”
Section: Dose Escalation For High-risk Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were randomly assigned to receive either uniform RT dose to the entire prostate (control arm) or RT to the entire prostate with a focal RT dose boost to gross disease (focal boost arm). Compared to the control arm, participants in the focal boost arm had improved disease-free survival, improved local control, and improved regional/distant metastasis-free survival 1,2 . No difference in toxicity was observed between the two groups 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%