2020
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of local, intercontinental and interseasonal variation of soil bacterial and eukaryotic microbial communities

Abstract: Although ongoing research has revealed some of the main drivers behind global spatial patterns of microbial communities, spatio-temporal dynamics of these communities still remain largely unexplored. Here, we investigate spatio-temporal variability of both bacterial and eukaryotic soil microbial communities at local and intercontinental scales. We compare how temporal variation in community composition scales with spatial variation in community composition, and explore the extent to which bacteria, protists, f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ΔpH), which may be different along different gradients such as pH and geography (Harrison et al ., 1992; Anderson et al ., 2011). Notably, as observed in previous studies (Monroy et al ., 2012; Jiao et al ., 2019; De Gruyter et al ., 2020), one group may have a higher variation of community structure but lower turnover along a specific gradient and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ΔpH), which may be different along different gradients such as pH and geography (Harrison et al ., 1992; Anderson et al ., 2011). Notably, as observed in previous studies (Monroy et al ., 2012; Jiao et al ., 2019; De Gruyter et al ., 2020), one group may have a higher variation of community structure but lower turnover along a specific gradient and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature, precipitation) and edaphic conditions (e.g. soil pH, moisture) are often seen as important determinants of microbial communities (Borowik & Wyszkowska, 2016;Singh et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2020) yet they cannot completely explain the full variation observed within microbial communities (De Gruyter et al, 2020). This suggests that biotic interactions also play an important role in shaping microbial communities (Geisen, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These primers also have the advantage to cover well the basal fungal groups (i.e., Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycotina, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycotina, Mucoromycota and Zoopagomycotina) when ITS primers are biased toward Dikarya. Fungal diversity could also be assessed jointly with protists using general eukaryotic primers, particularly the one targeting the V4 18S rRNA gene (see next section, e.g., [119]). The last alternative is to target the 28S rRNA gene with the primer combination LROR and LR3, with the 100 nucleotide (nt) region before the reverse primer being the best discriminant region for fungi [120].…”
Section: Identification Of Fungi From Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%