One feature recognized as a possible indication of fraudulent research is a deficit or excess of zeroes as terminal digits, compared to an expected rate of ten percent, in coefficients reported for regression and standard error coefficients. Some have translated various percentages of zeroes as terminal digits into an anomaly measure (e.g., fewer than three percent or more than twenty percent of zeroes as terminal digits might be classified as a "major" anomaly while 3.01 to 5.00% or 15.00 to 19.99% might be classified as a "moderate" anomaly). However, it has not been clear if such ordinal classifications have any meaning in terms of probability or statistical significance. The probability levels of various anomaly levels are presented and illustrated by an analysis of terminal zeroes in 16 research articles published by Dr. Eric Stewart, who has been accused of fabrication of data or results in several of his scientific publications. It is unlikely to find low probability levels (< .05) for coefficient samples of less than 50 cases but moderate or major anomalies usually have low probabilities for samples of more than 50 to 100 cases. In the case of Dr. Stewart, more than a dozen of his published articles featured probabilities below 5% with respect to zeroes as terminal digits. Using percentage classifications to create an anomaly measure for terminal digits appears to be useful when cases exceed fifty or sixty.