1997
DOI: 10.2307/2996597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Plant Diversity in Overbrowsed Primary and Mature Secondary Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest Stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A decrease in species richness following clearcutting has been reported by Duffy and Meier (1992) and Meier et al (1995) for forest floor herbs in cove hardwood forests in the southern Appalachians, USA. Rooney and Dress (1997) also reported a similar finding with respect to the forest floor vegetation of hemlock-northern hardwood forests in Pennsylvania, USA. In contrast to the findings of these studies, many reports have noted that clearcutting increases species richness, and the increase in species richness results primarily from the occurrence of early-successional, shade-intolerant species or ruderal species (e.g., Beese and Bryant, 1999;Kirby, 1990;Ozaki and Ohsawa, 1995;Jenkins and Parker, 1998;Aiba et al, 2001).…”
Section: Effects Of Traditional Management On Alpha and Beta Diversitiessupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decrease in species richness following clearcutting has been reported by Duffy and Meier (1992) and Meier et al (1995) for forest floor herbs in cove hardwood forests in the southern Appalachians, USA. Rooney and Dress (1997) also reported a similar finding with respect to the forest floor vegetation of hemlock-northern hardwood forests in Pennsylvania, USA. In contrast to the findings of these studies, many reports have noted that clearcutting increases species richness, and the increase in species richness results primarily from the occurrence of early-successional, shade-intolerant species or ruderal species (e.g., Beese and Bryant, 1999;Kirby, 1990;Ozaki and Ohsawa, 1995;Jenkins and Parker, 1998;Aiba et al, 2001).…”
Section: Effects Of Traditional Management On Alpha and Beta Diversitiessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Alpha diversity indicates species diversity or richness within a community, whereas beta diversity indicates the degree of difference in species compositions among different communities. Previous studies have found that the alpha diversity is lower in secondary forests than in primary or old-growth forests (Duffy and Meier, 1992;Meier et al, 1995;Guariguata et al, 1997;Rooney and Dress, 1997). Some studies have also reported differences in beta diversity along a topographical gradient between old-growth and secondary forests (Robertson et al, 1978;Muller, 1982;Christensen and Peet, 1984;Ozaki and Ohsawa, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Foresters often prescribe fire or scarification to improve seedbed conditions (Maissurow 1941, Pubanz 1996. The widespread replacement of natural disturbance regimes by short-rotation timber management may have eliminated rotting logs, pit and mound topography, or some other more cryptic but essential habitat feature needed for successful hemlock establishment (Alverson et al 1994, Rooney 1995, Rooney and Dress 1997, Rooney and Waller 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the observed changes in the herbaceous layer show an explicit trend, as a consequence of direct or indirect anthropogenic effects. A marked successional shift towards species-poorer herbaceous layer communities was detected as a result of abandonment of former management practices (Baeten et al 2010, Hédl et al 2010, lack of disturbance (Brewer 1980) and herbivory (Rooney and Dress 1997). A loss of rarer native plants (Hédl 2004) and the homogenization of the herbaceous layer was detected, and was attributed to high browsing pressure by deer herbivory (Wiegmann and Waller 2006), acidification (Durak 2010) and light deficit (Davison andForman 1982, Heinrichs et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resurvey studies investigated the understorey to detect potential long-term changes and to assess the role of different environmental variables as driving forces in deciduous forests. The observed changes were attributed to different background causes, such as combined effect of temperature increase and canopy opening (De Frenne et al 2013, abandonment of former forest management practices (Hédl et al 2010, Heinrichs et al 2014, lack of disturbance (Brewer 1980, Taverna et al 2005, deer herbivory (Rooney and Dress 1997, Taverna et al 2005, Wiegmann and Waller 2006, increased soil acidity (Falkengren-Grerup and Tyler 1991, Durak 2010, Šebesta et al 2011, nitrogen deposition (Verheyen et al 2012) and often the intermingled influence of several factors (Heinrichs et al 2014, Vanhellemont et al 2014, Bernhardt-Römermann et al 2015, Naaf and Kolk 2016. The majority of the observed changes in the herbaceous layer show an explicit trend, as a consequence of direct or indirect anthropogenic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%