1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00130-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of soil copper contamination and temporal changes in vegetation in the victinity of a copper rod rolling factory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionic stress at P1 soils with near to neutral pH was probably considerably lower than at the acidic soils at P5 and P6. The absence of P. annua at these more toxic sites is in line with the observations at other metal polluted sites where A. capillaris and Poa pratensis were identified as the most and least metal tolerant grass species, respectively (Lepp et al, 1997).…”
Section: Field Studysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The ionic stress at P1 soils with near to neutral pH was probably considerably lower than at the acidic soils at P5 and P6. The absence of P. annua at these more toxic sites is in line with the observations at other metal polluted sites where A. capillaris and Poa pratensis were identified as the most and least metal tolerant grass species, respectively (Lepp et al, 1997).…”
Section: Field Studysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A way how to evaluate metal tolerance in plants is to measure the survival rate in heavily toxic substrates or the reduction in growth rate (Lepp et al 1997). Using this approach in this study, we observed that soil liming differ in willow response to metal contamination in term of growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Especially Cu-resistant ecotypes of soil microorganisms and plants colonize such habitats, but these extreme conditions also impose great selection pressure that may trigger adaptive Cu tolerance. Relatively few plants seem to be able to evolve Cu-tolerant ecotypes (16,22,31). In tree species such genetic modifications are even less likely because of the long generation times (23,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%