2020
DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of territorial space use by Shining Sunbeams ( Aglaeactis cupripennis ), tropical montane hummingbirds

Abstract: For many territorial hummingbirds, habitat use is influenced primarily by the interaction between resource acquisition and non-foraging behaviors such as territory advertisement and defense. Previous research has highlighted the importance of foraging-associated habitat features like resource density and distribution in determining the space-use patterns of hummingbirds. Less is known, however, about how habitat selection associated with non-foraging behaviors influences space use by territorial species. We us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, telemetry data for hummingbirds is scant because they are very difficult to track (but see examples of hand-tracking in Hadley & Betts, 2009, Hazlehurst & Karubian, 2018, Zenzal Jr. et al, 2018, and thus very little is known about their movement ecology compared to other birds. Another study with high altitude Andean hummingbirds reports a similar territory size from handheld radio telemetry data (90th KDE average territory size for the Shining Sunbeam [Aglaeactis cupripennis] is 1.56 km 2 [Pavan et al, 2020], vs. 95th AKDE of 1.08 km 2 Great Sapphirewing and 0.86 km 2 Bronze-tailed Thornbill reported here). Hand-tracking individuals is limited to short time periods (some days) and small areas, is strongly biassed towards areas that are easier for researchers to traverse (Hazlehurst & Karubian, 2018), and may not produce sufficient data points to estimate home range sizes (Ward et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, telemetry data for hummingbirds is scant because they are very difficult to track (but see examples of hand-tracking in Hadley & Betts, 2009, Hazlehurst & Karubian, 2018, Zenzal Jr. et al, 2018, and thus very little is known about their movement ecology compared to other birds. Another study with high altitude Andean hummingbirds reports a similar territory size from handheld radio telemetry data (90th KDE average territory size for the Shining Sunbeam [Aglaeactis cupripennis] is 1.56 km 2 [Pavan et al, 2020], vs. 95th AKDE of 1.08 km 2 Great Sapphirewing and 0.86 km 2 Bronze-tailed Thornbill reported here). Hand-tracking individuals is limited to short time periods (some days) and small areas, is strongly biassed towards areas that are easier for researchers to traverse (Hazlehurst & Karubian, 2018), and may not produce sufficient data points to estimate home range sizes (Ward et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…precluding the use of GPS trackers) and most attempts to track fast-moving animals, such as hummingbirds, have been limited to hand-tracking, limiting the studies to a few focal individuals (e.g. Pavan et al, 2020). We tested our ARTS grid by tagging two hummingbird species and collecting basic information on their movement trajectories and utilisation distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%