2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of transitions in Paleolithic stages during MIS 3 and 2 in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These different rates of evolution of Paleolithic technologies strongly indicate heterogeneous timing in the utilization of blades owing to geographical limitations. Therefore, this study supports an earlier suggestion that Early Paleolithic tools were not suddenly replaced by blade and microblade tools (Bae & Bae, 2012; H. W. Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These different rates of evolution of Paleolithic technologies strongly indicate heterogeneous timing in the utilization of blades owing to geographical limitations. Therefore, this study supports an earlier suggestion that Early Paleolithic tools were not suddenly replaced by blade and microblade tools (Bae & Bae, 2012; H. W. Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, the ages of Paleolithic cultural layers at the study site and other sites in the Wonju area (Figure 1c) appear to cluster around the late MIS 3 period (30–40 ka). Although this finding agrees with recent studies demonstrating that Paleolithic activity in Korea mainly occurred between the middle MIS 3 and late MIS 2 (e.g., H. W. Lee, 2016), it is necessary to investigate the possible reasons for the clustering of Paleolithic occupations in the Wonju area in the late MIS 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the historical and ecological complexity of East Asia, northeastern Asia, consisting of modern northern China, Korea, Mongolia, eastern Siberia, and Japan, blade technology consistently appeared in the Upper Paleolithic archaeological record from the late Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3 to MIS 2 (ca. 40,000-11,000 BP) (e.g., Brantingham et al, 2001;Vasilevsky, 2006;Bar-Yosef and Wang, 2012;Gladyshev et al, 2012;Morisaki, 2012;Wang and Qu, 2014;Yi et al, 2014;Lee, 2016;Terry et al, 2016). For example, in China, blade technology probably appeared due to human southward migration to northwest China around 38,000-34,000 cal.…”
Section: Archipelago and Hokkaidomentioning
confidence: 99%