Pauses and Response Latencies: A Chronemic Analysis of Asynchronous CMC

Abstract

This study examines the chronemics of response latencies in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) by analyzing three datasets comprising a total of more than 150,000 responses: email responses created by corporate employees, responses created by university students in course discussion groups, and responses to questions posted in a public, commercial online information market. Mathematical analysis of response latencies reveals a normative pattern common to all three datasets: The response latencies yielded a powerlaw distribution, such that most of the responses (at least 70%) were created within the average response latency of the responders, while very few (at most 4%) of the responses were created after a period longer than 10 times the average response latency. These patterns persist across diverse user populations, contexts, technologies, and average response latencies. Moreover, it is shown that the same pattern appears in traditional, spoken communication and in other forms of online media such as online surveys. The implications of this uniformity are discussed, and three normative chronemic zones are identified.

Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia

“…For example, Joyce and Kraut (2006) on predicting users' continued participation in newsgroups; Kalman, Ravid, Raban, and Rafaeli, 2006 on silence in computer-mediated communication; Soroka and Rafaeli (2006) on online lurking behavior. As we will detail, early examinations of Wikipedians' motivations have taken aim at the psychological, sociological, community-oriented, economical, gratificational, and interactional aspects of potential sources for motivation.…”

An analysis of how Fortune 500 companies respond to users replying to company tweets

“…A simple way to appear transparent is to respond quickly to criticism or negative situations raised by users. Short response times convey respect while lengthy response times are likely to elicit negative reactions (Kalman et al, 2006). The confusion of a long pause or a permanent silence can be maddening for a user and debilitating for a company (Kalman & Rafaeli, 2011).…”

Temporal Accommodation in Government-public Interactions on Chinese Government Weibo in Emergency Context

“…Compared with Face to Face communication, the exploration of CMC under CAT framework focuses more on the message length and duration (shorter or longer response times) concerning the structural variables because of the lack of nonverbal cues [21]. In email, individuals tend to have very consistent response latencies [22], in which the faster response latencies lead to more positive interpersonal perceptions in supportive emails [23], in task emails [21] and in job-seeking emails [24]. Similarly, longer messages on an email discussion list resulted in more positive interpersonal perceptions [6].…”