2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Payout policy in Brazil: Dividends versus interest on equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that institutional factors can play a critical role in understanding the dividend behaviour in emerging markets. Boulton, et al [2012], have the same point of view. They pay particular attention to the role of taxes as a key factor influencing the dividend policy in Brazil.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that institutional factors can play a critical role in understanding the dividend behaviour in emerging markets. Boulton, et al [2012], have the same point of view. They pay particular attention to the role of taxes as a key factor influencing the dividend policy in Brazil.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 An exception is that of Benavides et al (2016), who show that Latin American firms' smooth dividends more in relatively well governed countries in the region, and that these firms show evidence of adhering to the pecking order and trade-off theories. Also, Boulton et al (2012) indicate a catering explanation for Brazilian firm preferences to pay cash dividends rather than interest on equity, despite tax incentives to the contrary. In this paper, we establish the comparative flexibility of payout policies in Latin America, and in so doing highlight an intriguing open question in the dividend policy literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A observância de um maior nível de payout entre as empresas do Nível 2 pode se justificar por maior potencial de crescimento das firmas, características específica como a dispersão acionária, o tamanho das empresas e o setor em que atuam (BEHN; CARVER; NEAL, 2013;BLISS;CHENG;DENIS, 2015;DRAGO et al, 2015;CARVALHAL-DA-SILVA;CHIEN, 2013). Tais resultados podem se justificar ainda em função de similaridades entre os instrumentos de fato utilizados pelas empresas do Nível 2, o ambiente econômico para as empresas listadas nesse segmento, menor aversão ao risco agregado com a maior expectativa de retorno futuro (BOULTON; BRAGA-ALVES; SHASTRI, 2012;CHANG;CHOU;HUANG, 2014).…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified