2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCN45 Analysis of Societal Costs Due to Work Productivity Loss and Activity Impairment from the Monaleesa-7 Trial of Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy (ET) in Premenopausal Women with HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the same data of MONALEESA-7 trial were used but extrapolated to women at the retirement age of 62 years. Thus, the study showed that ribociclib + endocrine therapy would potentially yield BRL 71.61 million less social costs than endocrine therapy alone 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In that study, the same data of MONALEESA-7 trial were used but extrapolated to women at the retirement age of 62 years. Thus, the study showed that ribociclib + endocrine therapy would potentially yield BRL 71.61 million less social costs than endocrine therapy alone 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For an estimated number of 4294 new cases of premenopausal HR+/HER2− ABC per year, the analyses indicated that women treated with ribociclib plus ET would potentially yield $12.95 million in productivity and activity compared with women treated with ET alone. 41 This study has strengths and limitations. A third party developed the model and performed the analyses, with no interference from the sponsor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For an estimated number of 4294 new cases of premenopausal HR+/HER2− ABC per year, the analyses indicated that women treated with ribociclib plus ET would potentially yield $12.95 million in productivity and activity compared with women treated with ET alone. 41…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%