2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR detection and identification of Alternaria species-groups in processed foods based on the genetic marker Alt a 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further molecular techniques are needed to guarantee rapid and reliable pathogen quantification. Here, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) can be helpful to quantify and differentiate pathogens because of its increased sensitivity (Schena et al 2004;Pavón et al 2010). Since its development in the 1990s, real-time PCR has emerged as a reliable and sensitive method for detecting and quantifying phytopathogenic and antagonistic fungi (Schena et al 2004), and represents a highly sensitive and specific technique for the detection and quantification of nucleic acids (Tylor et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further molecular techniques are needed to guarantee rapid and reliable pathogen quantification. Here, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) can be helpful to quantify and differentiate pathogens because of its increased sensitivity (Schena et al 2004;Pavón et al 2010). Since its development in the 1990s, real-time PCR has emerged as a reliable and sensitive method for detecting and quantifying phytopathogenic and antagonistic fungi (Schena et al 2004), and represents a highly sensitive and specific technique for the detection and quantification of nucleic acids (Tylor et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tested. Compared to previous DNA-based results using primers targeting the Alt a 1 gene (Pavón et al, 2010) or the same ITS-based primers in a PCR method (Pavón et al, 2011), the real-time RT-PCR assay described herein improved 100-fold the sensitivity. Such improvement can be explained because of the presence of a higher number of RNA copies and the use of a real-time format.…”
Section: Real-time Rt-pcr Analysis Of Viable and Heat Inactivated Altmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…in foods. They include conventional or real-time PCR using specific primers (Andersen, Smedsgaard, Jorring, Skouboe, & Pedersen, 2006;Guillemette, Iacomi, & Simoneau, 2004;Konstantinova, Bonants, van GentPelzer, van der Zouwen, & van den Bulk, 2002;Pavón, González, Pegels, Martín, & García, 2010;Pavón et al, 2011;Zur, Shimoni, Hallerman, & Kashi, 2002), and also PCR amplification followed by complementary techniques such as sequencing, PCR-RFLP, PCR-RAPD or PCR-AFLP (Bensassi, Zid, Rhouma, Bacha, & Hajlaoui, 2009;Diguta, Vincent, Guilloux-Benatier, Alexandre, & Rousseaux, 2011;Pryor & Michailides, 2002;Somma et al, 2011). Because DNA is a stable molecule, DNA-based methods cannot distinguish between living and dead cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total DNA extraction from raw tomato samples and tomato products was performed using the Wizard Ò DNA Clean-up System kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) as previously described (Pavón, González, Pegels, Martín, & García, 2010). DNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Montchanin, DE).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting DNA fragments were visualized by UV transillumination and analysed using a Chemidoc XRS System. PCR products obtained from samples that tested negative for the presence of ALT, AOH or AME were gel-purified and sequenced as previously described (Pavón et al, 2010). The sequences obtained were searched for homology to those available at the GenBank-EMBL database using the BLAST program (NCBI software package).…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%