PD and PID control of a maglev system an experimental comparative study

Rojas-Moreno, Arturo; Cuevas-Condor, Cristian

doi:10.1109/intercon.2017.8079678

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to [32], a PID-based controller outperforms the PD controller because the steady state error was lowered to zero when two feedback control systems (PID & PD) were used to levitate a magnet disc utilizing the lower magnet of the Maglev according to however the PID control system need to exert more control effort during the initial two seconds of operation. In terms of robustness handling of noises and uncertainties, the integrated PID and adaptive sliding-mode controller are employed in a number of experimental findings [33].…”

Section: Magnetic Levitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Non-Contact Manipulation for Robotic Applications: A Review on Acoustic Levitation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robots play an important role all over the world in the industrial field in terms of dealing with various materials, performing duties quickly and high accuracy as well as in the pharmaceutical/chemical field since robots can handle some issues better than human. Robotic manipulation is the term used to describe how robots deal with many objects. This article reviews the contact and non-contact manipulation with their most common robotic applications and focusing on the non-contact manipulation since it can do specific tasks which contact manipulation cannot do. Reviewing of the robotic non-contact manipulation which include the metal-based robotic manipulation such as magnetic and electrostatic levitation and the non-metal-based robotic manipulation method such as aerodynamic and acoustic levitation have been made in this article. The main core of this article is acoustic levitation which considered one of the most important levitation and manipulation method due to the recent advancements that made it proper to deal with any kind of materials. Here, we review the renowned three methods of acoustic levitation that already using in robotic non-contact manipulation which are standing wave, near-field and single-beam acoustic levitation. Then, we present a performance characteristic of the reviewed methods and the summary of controlling strategies, followed by conclusion and future recommendations for acoustic levitation methods as a non-contact manipulation.

show abstract

Section: Magnetic Levitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Non-Contact Manipulation for Robotic Applications: A Review on Acoustic Levitation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have used various methods to control object of a maglev system, including controlling maglev objects using sliding mode control [2], but the maglev equation is changed from nonlinear to linear so that if implemented on the plant the controller will not be optimal. Then, control of a magnetic levitation system using PD (Proportional Derivative) and PID (Proportional Integral Derivative) controller [3]. The PID control system demonstrates better performance in steady-state error and settling time rather than PD control system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sliding Mode Control with Gain Scheduled for Magnetic Levitation System

Uswarman

Istiqphara

Nugroho

2019

Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer Dan Informatika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a study of controlling magnetic levitation object using conventional sliding mode control (CSMC) and sliding mode control (SMC) with gain-scheduled. SMC with gain-scheduled aims to improve the robustness of the control system from disturbance. The CSMC simulation results show that output can follow the set point if there is no interference, but if the disturbance happens then there is overshoot and undershoot of 0.034 mm and 0.07 mm for disturbance 10 * sin( ) and 20 * sin( ). Then SMC with gain-scheduled shows excellent performance because the output can follow the reference even if it got disturbance of 10 * sin( ) and 20 * sin( ).

show abstract

“…Topics: from MIMO IO to MIMO FO controllers, applications. Some topics of this chapter are based on the work published in[13].Chapter 9: Control of SISO and MIMO time-delay processes. Contents: PID control of SISO time-delay plants, MBPC control of SISO and MIMO stable time-delay plants, discrete-time LQR (Linear Quadratic Regulator) control of SISO and MIMO time-delay plants, LQ predictive control in the discrete state-space domain of SISO and MIMO stable, unstable, non-minimum phase and integral time-delay plants.Seven4-hour sessions in a 16-week semester are employed to perform the following experiments: Lab 1: Process identification (Control Systems Lab).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Undergraduate Education in Control Engineering

Moreno¹

2019

Proceedings of the 17th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Industry, Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses the content of two basic courses in control engineering: Feedback Control Systems and Process Control with their associated Lab (laboratory) sessions. Such undergraduate level courses are lectured at the Electronic and Mechatronic Engineering Department (EMED) of UTEC (Universidad de Ingenieria y Tecnologia, Peru). The Lab sessions are performed in the Control Systems as well as in the Process Automation Labs. The structured experiments with their rubrics are carried out by the students after covering the corresponding theory classes. This methodology permits students to bridge the gap between theory and practice by means of hands-on and open (reconfigurable and reprogrammable) plants. An open plant allows the renewal of experiments. On the other hand, UTEC employs a methodology to engage undergraduate students to perform research. Several papers published in indexed international conferences ware based on various experiments performed by the students in the Lab sessions.

show abstract

PD and PID control of a maglev system an experimental comparative study

Cited by 10 publications

References 6 publications

A Non-Contact Manipulation for Robotic Applications: A Review on Acoustic Levitation

A Non-Contact Manipulation for Robotic Applications: A Review on Acoustic Levitation

Sliding Mode Control with Gain Scheduled for Magnetic Levitation System

Enhancing Undergraduate Education in Control Engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About