2015
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak flow responses to strip thinning in a nested, forested headwater catchment

Abstract: Abstract:We evaluated the effects of 50% strip thinning on peak flow responses in 17-ha and 9-ha nested catchments. We observed 117 storm events from April 2010 to December 2013, including 32 events in the pre-thinning period, 15 events during the thinning operation, and 70 events in the post-thinning period. Paired-catchment analysis with multiple pairs of nested gauging stations revealed that changes in peak flow responses varied depending on the location of the nested observation stations. Increases in peak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Dung et al (2015) found different hydrological responses among nested catchments caused by changes of hydrological connectivity via overland flow generated by newly installed and reactivated skidding trails. Skidding trails and forest roads can play roles of sediment source and pathway for runoff and sediment, from forest floor to stream channel (Mizugaki et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Dung et al (2015) found different hydrological responses among nested catchments caused by changes of hydrological connectivity via overland flow generated by newly installed and reactivated skidding trails. Skidding trails and forest roads can play roles of sediment source and pathway for runoff and sediment, from forest floor to stream channel (Mizugaki et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The two subcatchments have been extensively described elsewhere (Kato et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2014a, b andc, 2015a andDung et al, 2015), and a summary is provided below. Two hillslope plots were installed in the cypress plantation of the K2 SubC, named KS22 and KS24, Geomorphology, DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017 López-Vicente et al, 2017 -Hydrological connectivity in two Japanese forest catchments and one plot in the cedar plantation, named KS31 (Fig.…”
Section: Field Observations and Model Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subcatchment areas for K21, K22, K23, K24, K31 and K32 were 15.1, 6.6, 4.1, 2.6, 8.5, and 2.9 ha, respectively. Paired‐catchment analysis was applied to these basins on the basis of their runoff characteristics observed before the thinning (Dung et al , ). In addition, the patterns of discharge and nutrient concentrations were similar during this period (K21 and K31 in Figure and others in Supplementary Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, abandonment of these terraces can generate concentrated runoff and sediment flows along preferential pathways created by the successive collapse of several terraces, promoting connections between these pathways and the main stream network (Calsamiglia et al, 2017). Changes in connectivity can explain changes in catchment runoff response and sediment yield (Meerkerk et al, 2009;López-Vicente et al, 2013a;Dung et al, 2015). Thus, a general decrease in connectivity is expected to reduce streamflow and sediment discharge.…”
Section: Catchment Based Hydrology Under Post Farmland Abandonment Scmentioning
confidence: 99%