The API 20E system was applied and evaluated for the identification of 60 bacterial contaminants, isolated from South African lager beer breweries and tentatively identified as Enterobacteriaceae. The results were compared with the groupings obtained by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of soluble proteins and by gas chromatography of volatile metabolites. Numerical analysis of the results obtained by all three methods revealed an excellent overall agreement. The API 20E system proved to be a rapid and fairly accurate (90%) method for identification of enterobacterial contaminants in beer breweries. Without referral to the API computer service, the API 20E system correctly identified 78 and 85% of the isolates to the species and genus level, respectively. Reference to the computer centre allowed an additional 5% of strains to be identified correctly to the species level.By combining the results of the three methods, 92% of the strains were finally identified as (numbers of strains in brackets): Enterohacter agglomeruns (I@, Ent. cloacae (9, Enterobucter sp. (4), 'Hufnia protea' (7), Hafnia alvei (3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3), KI. oxytoca (7), Serratiu marcexens (9, Citrobacter freundii ( 2 ) and Proteus mirabilis (1). Five isolates remained unidentified.ENTEROBACTERIACEAE have been detected as contaminants in beer brewery samples, most commonly in prefermentation wort and in the early stages of fermentations ). In the present study 60 bacterial strains, isolated in South Africa as contaminants during the beer brewing process and tentatively identified as Enterobacteriaceae, were characterized by phenotypic tests using the API 20E system, by gas chromatographic analysis of volatile metabolites produced by the bacterial strains in a standardized growth medium, and by comparison of their respective electrophoretic protein patterns determined by gel electrophoresis. The latter technique enables the detection of strains with high genetic similarity (Kersters & De Ley 1975). Computerized numerical analysis was used to compare the results obtained by these three methods. It was possible to identify the majority (92%) of the isolates by the combined results of the three techniques. The taxonomic position of some strains was verified by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA): ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) hybridizations.