2006
DOI: 10.1002/star.200600541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peculiarities of Starch Cationization with Glycidyltrimethylammonium Chloride

Abstract: Cationic starch derivatives containing quaternary ammonium groups with high degree of substitution are prepared by reaction of starch with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTAC) in different reaction media. In aqueous solutions of GTAC along with conventional hydrolysis of epoxy groups, their interaction with chloride ions also takes place. This resulted in formation of hydroxyl ions which accelerate both the hydrolysis of GTAC epoxy groups and can act as the internal catalyst in the reaction of GTAC with s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the DS increases with increase in the ratio a/AGU, but the efficiency decreases in the order: (ii) > (iii) > (i). The higher efficiency of GTAC versus CHPTAC was previously shown for the starch quaternization (Bendoraitiene, Kavaliauskaite, Klimaviciute, & Zemaitaitis, 2006;Haack et al, 2002), and was explained by the competition between the main quaternization reaction and the CHPTAC enhanced inactivation due to the higher content in NaOH required for the procedure (i). The better performances of the procedure (iii) in comparison with (i) can be a supplementary proof of glycidyl derivative formation in situ, in the absence of NaOH.…”
Section: Comparison Of Quaternization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In all cases, the DS increases with increase in the ratio a/AGU, but the efficiency decreases in the order: (ii) > (iii) > (i). The higher efficiency of GTAC versus CHPTAC was previously shown for the starch quaternization (Bendoraitiene, Kavaliauskaite, Klimaviciute, & Zemaitaitis, 2006;Haack et al, 2002), and was explained by the competition between the main quaternization reaction and the CHPTAC enhanced inactivation due to the higher content in NaOH required for the procedure (i). The better performances of the procedure (iii) in comparison with (i) can be a supplementary proof of glycidyl derivative formation in situ, in the absence of NaOH.…”
Section: Comparison Of Quaternization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This phenomenon may be explained by several reasons, as follows: Firstly, microwave enables direct heating of the target materials containing mobile electric charges, such as alkali cellulose and etherifying agent even in solid-state reaction, which permits forward reaction with less water or other polar solvents as compared to the conventional heating methods [42]. Thus the possibility of side-reaction hydrolysis given above is largely reduced and the GTMAC-utilized effectiveness is greatly enhanced.…”
Section: Effect Of Water/dmso Volume Ratiomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Secondly, the GTMAC-based etherification can be easily evoked under mild conditions of microwave irradiation due to the low activation energy of its main reaction [29]. The microwave energies are lower than the Brownian motions, that is, microwave chemistry is based on efficient heating materials and not induction of chemical bond cleavage [42]. Consequently, it is more effective to prevent electromagnetic-radiation degradation of chemical reagents and cationic product by means of microwave irradiation.…”
Section: Effect Of Water/dmso Volume Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, a starch concentration of 40% (w/w) resulted in a higher DS at both active amine/starch molar ratios in the pres- ence of 60% sucrose (starch solids basis), compared to the DS value obtained at a starch concentration of 30%. Research (Bendoraitiene, Kavaliauskaite, Klimaviciute, & Zemaitaitis, 2006) has pointed out that DS and RE decrease when the amount of available water is twice or thrice as high as that required to hydrate starch, dissolve the catalyst, diffuse the cationic reagent, and facilitate the swelling of the starch granule during the cationization process. The optimum starch/water ratio for an aqueous-alcoholic starch cationization process was approximately 1:1 (Kweon, Sosulski, & Bhirud, 1997).…”
Section: Effect Of Starch Concentration In the Presence Of Sucrosementioning
confidence: 98%