2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedagogies for active citizenship: Learning through affective and cognitive domains for deeper democratic engagement

Abstract: This paper reports on a two-year study that explored teachers' pedagogical approaches when implementing an active citizenship curriculum initiative in New Zealand. Our aim was to identify pedagogies which afforded potential for critical and transforma tive citizenship learning. We define critical and transformative social action through a fusion of critical pedagogy and Dewey's notion of democratic education. Data included teachers' classroom-based research as well as classroom observations and intervie ws wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the result, an average, positive and significant relationship between affective and cognitive engagements was observed. Wood et al (2018) explained the importance of relating cognitive and affective in ensuring engagement in learning. By establishing an affectively engaging learning environment, the instructor was able to promote various cognitive skills during learning such as elaborating, critical thinking and self-directed learning (Koszalka & Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the result, an average, positive and significant relationship between affective and cognitive engagements was observed. Wood et al (2018) explained the importance of relating cognitive and affective in ensuring engagement in learning. By establishing an affectively engaging learning environment, the instructor was able to promote various cognitive skills during learning such as elaborating, critical thinking and self-directed learning (Koszalka & Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idealized vision of citizenship education dismisses the importance of the automatic ways individuals think and act, as well as the resistance to critical review that individual and collective emotions and identities exert [53,56]. As a growing number of scholars warn, citizenship learning requires both cognitive and affective engagement (e.g., [17,[57][58][59]). This affective engagement may require the arousal of emotions of anger and anxiety, confronting the tradition of what Hermans calls the 'smiling fascism' [60].…”
Section: Populism and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because that the affective domain is very important in 'its relationship with social action especially at the beginning of the learning process'. (Wood, Taylor, Atkins, & Johnston, 2018) where learning must be based on preferences, and the social realm provides a great opportunity for learning preferences. Furthermore, 'affective domains are closely related to student academic achievement' (Green & Batool, 2017).…”
Section: The Foreign Language Learning Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%