2015
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedal grasping in an arboreal rodent relates to above‐branch behavior on slender substrates

Abstract: In order to exploit the three-dimensional, discontinuous and unstable arboreal milieu, most arboreal mammals employ efficient foot (pedal) grasping that establishes firm contact with the substrate and enables secure and safe locomotion and postures. Such pedal grasp can be performed in variable ways in relation to substrate characteristics. In order to investigate the interplay between pedal grasping modes, arboreal locomotor and postural behavior, and substrate size and inclination in arboreal mammals, we fil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising given that (a) it would presumably be quite difficult for the rats to maintain a horizontal foraging strategy in the tilted lattice where all of the bars ran diagonally and (b) in the tilted lattice movement along all three dimensions of the maze was easier than vertical movements in the aligned lattice and all three were equal in terms of energy expenditure. Previous research has similarly reported a horizontal bias in the movements of rats climbing cubic lattices (Grobéty and Schenk 1992 ; Jovalekic et al 2011 ), captive tamarins and marmosets climbing branches (Chamove and Goldsborough 2004 ), marmosets climbing cubic lattices (Schenk et al 1995 ), captive African woodland dormice climbing unstructured branches (Youlatos et al 2015 ) and wild arboreal dormice climbing trees (Bright and Morris 1991 ). In contrast, Flores-Abreu et al ( 2014 ) found that rats moved vertically more than horizontally in a cubic lattice, although this was likely because the animals were making direct paths to reward sites which were horizontally closer on average to their starting positions than vertically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is surprising given that (a) it would presumably be quite difficult for the rats to maintain a horizontal foraging strategy in the tilted lattice where all of the bars ran diagonally and (b) in the tilted lattice movement along all three dimensions of the maze was easier than vertical movements in the aligned lattice and all three were equal in terms of energy expenditure. Previous research has similarly reported a horizontal bias in the movements of rats climbing cubic lattices (Grobéty and Schenk 1992 ; Jovalekic et al 2011 ), captive tamarins and marmosets climbing branches (Chamove and Goldsborough 2004 ), marmosets climbing cubic lattices (Schenk et al 1995 ), captive African woodland dormice climbing unstructured branches (Youlatos et al 2015 ) and wild arboreal dormice climbing trees (Bright and Morris 1991 ). In contrast, Flores-Abreu et al ( 2014 ) found that rats moved vertically more than horizontally in a cubic lattice, although this was likely because the animals were making direct paths to reward sites which were horizontally closer on average to their starting positions than vertically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One possibility for these differences is that it was less easy for rats to rest in the maze. Climbing rodents generally prefer horizontal branches over oblique and vertical ones for travelling, foraging and nesting (Meserve 1977 ; Urbani and Youlatos 2013 ; Youlatos et al 2015 ). We never tested if rats preferred one lattice orientation over the other, but together, these results suggest that with the pervasive slope in the tilted lattice rats may have needed to rest more frequently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reap the advantages of arboreality, rodents (as other arboreal mammals) must safely and skilfully negotiate substrates of variable size, inclination, length and flexibility, in the complex, three‐dimensional and discontinuous habitat of the different forest layers (Cartmill, ; Hildebrand, ). Towards this end, the morphology and locomotor and postural behaviour are accordingly specialized (Cartmill, ; Essner, ; Kirk et al ., ; Samuels & Van Valkenburgh, ; Schmidt & Fischer, ; Camargo et al ., , ; Youlatos et al ., ). Regarding locomotion, gaits can function as a mechanism that promotes stable and safe displacement along arboreal substrates (Cartmill, Lemelin & Schmitt, , ; Lammers & Gauntner, ; Lemelin & Cartmill, ; Lammers & Zurcher, ,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the likely small body size as suggested by stem placental fossils (Ji et al, 2002;Luo et al, 2011;Youlatos et al, 2015) and early members of the Euarchontoglires (e.g., plesiadapiforms, Silcox and López-Torres, 2017), small body size should be one of the main considerations when identifying potential modern analogs for early primates and further early Euarchontoglires (Nyakatura, 2019). This is especially important considering the size threshold for effective asymmetrical locomotion proposed by Chadwell and Young (2015).…”
Section: Implications For the Reconstruction Of The Locomotion Of The Euarchontogliran Ancestormentioning
confidence: 99%