2019 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/eiconrus.2019.8656744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEDOT and PANI Electrodes for IP2C Actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were able to achieve higher maximum strains at 1.0 V than the SAFT actuators used in this study, but its response time was reported to be greater than 9 min (Khmelnitskiy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Actuation Studies For All Polymeric Ionic Eapmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They were able to achieve higher maximum strains at 1.0 V than the SAFT actuators used in this study, but its response time was reported to be greater than 9 min (Khmelnitskiy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Actuation Studies For All Polymeric Ionic Eapmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Others in literature who have attempted to use CP electrodes for their actuators experienced strains of around 0.4% when actuating less than 2 V ( Lee et al, 2013 ; Cheedarala et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2014 ; Rasouli et al, 2017 ). And in another similar study, they directly polymerized PANI and PEDOT onto a manually roughened Nafion membrane without any SAFT ( Khmelnitskiy et al, 2019 ). They were able to achieve higher maximum strains at 1.0 V than the SAFT actuators used in this study, but its response time was reported to be greater than 9 min ( Khmelnitskiy et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations