Peer‐counseling for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A randomized community/research collaboration trial

Giese‐Davis, Janine; Bliss-Isberg, Caroline; Wittenberg, Lynne; White, Jennifer; Star, Path; Ling, Zhong; Cordova, Matthew J.; Houston, Debra; Spiegel, David

doi:10.1002/cncr.30036

Cited by 37 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 49 publications

(86 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Six articles examined the efficacy of PN for survivorship, and 5 of them (83%) included breast cancer . Two studies reported that PN interventions significantly improved cancer‐specific well‐being, emotional well‐being, and quality of life .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…109,118,119 Survivorship Six articles examined the efficacy of PN for survivorship, and 5 of them (83%) included breast cancer. [122][123][124][125][126][127] Two studies reported that PN interventions significantly improved cancer-specific well-being, emotional well-being, and quality of life. 123,124 Other studies showed that PN interventions resulted in higher rates of attendance to medical appointments, lower rates of hospitalization, and fewer intensive care unit admissions and emergency room visits.…”

Section: Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review

Bernardo

Zhang

Hery

et al. 2019

Cancer

139

166

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Published studies regarding patient navigation (PN) and cancer were reviewed to assess quality, determine gaps, and identify avenues for future research. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of PN across the cancer continuum. Each included article was scored independently by 2 separate reviewers with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. The current review identified 113 published articles that assessed PN and cancer care, between August 1, 2010, and February 1, 2018, 14 of which reported on the cost‐effectiveness of PN programs. Most publications focused on the effectiveness of PN in screening (50%) and diagnosis (27%) along the continuum of cancer care. Many described the effectiveness of PN for breast cancer (52%) or colorectal cancer outcomes (51%). Most studies reported favorable outcomes for PN programs, including increased uptake of and adherence to cancer screenings, timely diagnostic resolution and follow‐up, higher completion rates for cancer therapy, and higher rates of attending medical appointments. Cost‐effectiveness studies showed that PN programs yielded financial benefits. Quality assessment showed that 75 of the 113 included articles (65%) had 2 or more weak components. In conclusion, this review indicates numerous gaps within the PN and cancer literature where improvement is needed. For example, more research is needed at other points along the continuum of cancer care outside of screening and diagnosis. In addition, future research into the effectiveness of PN for understudied cancers outside of breast and colorectal cancer is necessary along with an assessment of cost‐effectiveness and more rigorous reporting of study designs and results in published articles.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review

Bernardo

Zhang

Hery

et al. 2019

Cancer

139

166

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, personal peer support contact has been reported to improve wellbeing [12, 15], prepare for recovery [12], and increase self-efficacy [14, 17]. Professionally led peer support groups with health education improved physical, emotional, and social wellbeing as well [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Professionally led peer support groups with health education improved physical, emotional, and social wellbeing as well [10]. Peer support has also been associated with more life purpose, less depression [10, 11, 17], fewer breast cancer concerns [17], preserved marital adjustment [15], and better future perspective [17]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, Gotay et al [16] found no differences in distress or depressive symptoms between peer-supported and peer-non-supported breast cancer women. Likewise, Giese-Davis et al [15] reported that peer support did not affect trauma symptoms, self-efficacy, or depressive symptoms. In a study by Lee et al [14], peer support had no effect on anxiety, depression, or mental adjustment and, in a study by Nápoles et al [17], on depression or somatization.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

Toija

Kettunen

Leidenius

et al. 2018

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeBreast cancer is the most common cancer of Finnish women. Peer support could be a way to help breast cancer patients to deal with the disease but studies on its effectiveness have produced conflicting results. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to study the effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of breast cancer patients.MethodsPatients with recently diagnosed breast cancer at the Helsinki University Hospital were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 130) or control (n = 130) groups. The intervention group patients received peer support via telephone one to five times according to their preference. The control group received usual care only. HRQoL was assessed with generic (15D) and disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-30 and its breast cancer specific module BR23) instruments at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points.ResultsThe mean (SD) age of the patients was 60.0 (10.5) years and their baseline mean 15D score 0.922 (0.066). At baseline, the intervention and control groups did not differ from each other. During follow-up, the 15D score deteriorated statistically significantly (p < 0.001) and clinically importantly in both groups but slightly less in the intervention group although the difference was not significant. Regarding individual 15D dimensions, the EORTC-QLQ30, or its breast-specific module, peer support did not show any consistent advantage compared to usual care.ConclusionPeer support had no clear effect on the HRQoL of breast cancer patients.

show abstract

What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map

Price

Bell

Shaw

et al. 2022

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Peer support interventions involve people drawing on shared personal experience to help one another improve their physical or mental health, or reduce social isolation. If effective, they may also lessen the demand on health and social care services, reducing costs. However, the design and delivery of peer support varies greatly, from the targeted problem or need, the setting and mode of delivery, to the number and content of sessions. Robust evidence is essential for policymakers commissioning peer support and practitioners delivering services in health care and community settings. This map draws together evidence on different types of peer support to support the design and delivery of interventions.Objectives: The aim of this map was to provide an overview of the volume, diversity and nature of recent, high quality evidence on the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of the use of peer support in health and social care. Search Methods: We searched MEDLINE, seven further bibliographic databases, and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews (in October 2020), randomised controlled trials (in March 2021) and economic evaluations (in May 2021) on the effectiveness of peer support interventions in health and social care. We also conducted searches of Google Scholar, two trial registers, PROSPERO, and completed citation chasing on included studies.Selection Criteria: Systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials and economic evaluations were included in the map. Included studies focused on adult populations with a defined health or social care need, were conducted in high-income countries, and published since 2015. Any measure of effectiveness was included, as was any form of peer support providing the peer had shared experience with the participant and a formalised role.

show abstract

Peer‐counseling for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A randomized community/research collaboration trial

Cited by 37 publications

References 49 publications

The efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review

The efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review

Effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About