2011
DOI: 10.1002/ss.385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer education in student leadership programs: Responding to co‐curricular challenges

Abstract: The use of peer educators is standard in many student leadership development programs. This chapter includes an overview of leadership theory, leadership research, and considerations for designing curricular and co‐curricular peer leadership programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They have found out that in general, the impact of both was positive, with the latter being more significant even though extensive off-campus work simultaneously undercut the effect of co-curricular involvement on leadership. Finally, a significantly higher level of leadership skills among students involved in cocurricular activities on all scales of the SLOI seems quite logical and consistent with findings of other studies (Foreman & Retallick, 2013;Haber, 2011;Hall, Forrester, & Borsz, 2008), revealing such positive outcomes of co-curricular participation for students' leadership capacities as development of attitudes, values, and aspirations, personal empowerment and growth, collaboration, educational development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They have found out that in general, the impact of both was positive, with the latter being more significant even though extensive off-campus work simultaneously undercut the effect of co-curricular involvement on leadership. Finally, a significantly higher level of leadership skills among students involved in cocurricular activities on all scales of the SLOI seems quite logical and consistent with findings of other studies (Foreman & Retallick, 2013;Haber, 2011;Hall, Forrester, & Borsz, 2008), revealing such positive outcomes of co-curricular participation for students' leadership capacities as development of attitudes, values, and aspirations, personal empowerment and growth, collaboration, educational development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Though less common, peer teaching and peer mentoring programs have potential as leadership practice fields that merge instruction, experience, and reflection in a recursive cycle of learning. Less studied than larger, campus-wide leadership development programs, peer mentor roles have received some attention by scholars over the last decade (Colvin & Ashman, 2010;Ender & Newton, 2010;Haber, 2011;Harmon, 2006;Johnson, 2009;North-Samardzic & Cohen, 2016;Walters & Kanak, 2016…”
Section: Review Of Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, cultivating students' capacity for future leadership has become central to the mission of higher education, resulting in a proliferation of leadership development opportunities both in and out of the classroom (Haber, 2011;Osteen & Coburn, 2012;Rosch & Schwartz, 2009). Peer leadership programs have become especially popular, given their perceived efficacy for developing leadership skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes educational activities, research and extracurricular activities, creativity, organizational activities, etc. Being engaged in social aspects of university life and taking part in various organizational activities, students have an opportunity to advance their personal development (Huang and Chang, 2004).In this research, the organizational activity of students is considered in the most effective way of promoting individuals to the leading positions and forming the necessary leadership qualities for this (Haber, 2011). Participation of students in different organizational activities helps form and develop the system of leadership qualities and leadership skills for the majority of students, including those whose leadership qualities are not sufficiently formed.…”
Section: Procedures Of Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%