2002
DOI: 10.1021/ac022161m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Reviewed: Isotopically Labeled Analogues for Drug Quantitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Identification and quantification of drugs and metabolites by LC/MS relies very much on stable isotope-labeled analogues. 7,8 Analytical procedures to determine both compounds, SU11248 and SU12662, in biological matrices, e.g. monkey blood samples, have been published.…”
Section: Marketed As Sutentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Identification and quantification of drugs and metabolites by LC/MS relies very much on stable isotope-labeled analogues. 7,8 Analytical procedures to determine both compounds, SU11248 and SU12662, in biological matrices, e.g. monkey blood samples, have been published.…”
Section: Marketed As Sutentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is generally called matrix effects (Birkemeyer et al, 2005). When analytes affect the measurements of ISs, the matrix effect is called cross-contribution (Liu et al, 2002), which is a serious problem for IS-based normalization. The severity of the problem is easily seen considering an analyte that is affected by the experimental design and in turn, via cross-contribution, causes the same signal to be visible in the IS.…”
Section: Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Identification and quantification of drugs and metabolites by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) relies largely on stable isotope-labeled analogs. 7,8 A renewed interest has been recently raised to develop a robust and validated LC-MS method to determine simvastatin in biological fluids. The preparation of the stable labeled version of the title compound with M + 6 was requested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%