2004
DOI: 10.1021/ac0415509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Reviewed: Plasma Source TOFMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 However, DLs for ion-counting ICP-TOFMS are substantially better, down to 0.1 ng L À1 for a 10 s integration. 51 Of course, there is no fundamental reason why ICP-DOFMS could not also be operated in an ion-counting mode if a fast enough optical detector is used. Such ion-counting MCP/phosphor detector arrays have been reported.…”
Section: Detection Limits and Linear Dynamic Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 However, DLs for ion-counting ICP-TOFMS are substantially better, down to 0.1 ng L À1 for a 10 s integration. 51 Of course, there is no fundamental reason why ICP-DOFMS could not also be operated in an ion-counting mode if a fast enough optical detector is used. Such ion-counting MCP/phosphor detector arrays have been reported.…”
Section: Detection Limits and Linear Dynamic Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-of-flight mass spectrometry has since long been known in instrumental analysis with SIMS, and so on, and been developed into a feasible detection system in ICP-MS [139]. Because of the mass range to be covered (1-238 amu), reasonable acceleration voltages (2 kV), and flight-tube lengths (1 m) permit the generation of 20 000-30 000 mass spectra per s. Both end-on and orthogonal geometry are possible and commercially available (LECO Renaissance and GBC Scientific Optimass 8000).…”
Section: Time-of-flight Icp-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total analysis time is proportional to the number of m/z values monitored and, for transient signals, an inherent trade-off will always exist between the mass range covered or the number of target nuclides monitored, on one hand, and the achievable precision with which the analyte peak profiles can be defined, on the other. 35 Thus, it is generally accepted that the use of ETV for sample introduction results in a loss in the multi-element capabilities of ICPMS. While this assumption is logical, the key question is to establish how many nuclides can be determined without a significant degration in the analytical performance.…”
Section: Performance In Simultaneous Multi-element Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%