2021
DOI: 10.2196/20898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Social Media Messages on Sexual Health in a School-Based Intervention: Opportunities and Challenges Identified in the STASH Feasibility Trial

Abstract: Background There is a strong interest in the use of social media to spread positive sexual health messages through social networks of young people. However, research suggests that this potential may be limited by a reluctance to be visibly associated with sexual health content on the web or social media and by the lack of trust in the veracity of peer sources. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate opportunities and challenges of using socia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we might suggest that overall, joining a Facebook group was a fairly accepted behaviour and students were receptive to the idea. Other findings of the STASH process evaluation reported elsewhere 36 , also confirm different levels of engagement in STASH FB groups in different schools (e.g., school 3 presented the highest prevalence of face-to-face interactions because FB was a less popular platform among their school year group) and that their online engagement in STASH was mostly in parallel with their habitual use of social media. These results highlighted the challenge of engaging youth in social media interventions in sexual health.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we might suggest that overall, joining a Facebook group was a fairly accepted behaviour and students were receptive to the idea. Other findings of the STASH process evaluation reported elsewhere 36 , also confirm different levels of engagement in STASH FB groups in different schools (e.g., school 3 presented the highest prevalence of face-to-face interactions because FB was a less popular platform among their school year group) and that their online engagement in STASH was mostly in parallel with their habitual use of social media. These results highlighted the challenge of engaging youth in social media interventions in sexual health.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…By exploring the relational aspects of these processes with MERGMs we aimed at understanding: how the presence of friendship ties between students at one level (node set A) is associated with the presence of affiliation ties on FB groups at another level (node set B). In this way, we sought to assess whether the creation of online communities on FB mirrored the offline adolescent groups that we expected to be aligned as per STASH instructions and delivery, and provide an understanding of the use of FB social media in disseminating prevention messages on sexual health among friends 36 . In order to evaluate the potential mechanisms of impact and the contextual processes related to the STASH intervention, we focused on how student-to-student relationships were shaped and formed, taking into account students’ characteristics and the role of PS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Internet and social media could be utilised to provide safe spaces for peer-to-peer discussion regarding sexuality and sexual health. This method could be especially effective with the involvement of trained peer-supporters to guide the discussion and clarify misinformation [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely explanation was the presence of a STASH trainer in the online groups. Although close monitoring by trainers allayed fears and possibly prevented such incidents, it may also have stifled 'natural' engagement with STASH Facebook messages (see also Hirvonen et al [43]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%