1975
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.1975.12086342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peers as Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, gifted children are less likely to have the opportunity to learn from a model than average children (Bandura, 1986). Above all, children of the same age, who generally assume a particularly important modeling function (Hartup & Lougee, 1975;Schunk, 1987), cannot be optimally used as models by the gifted. All the more alarming was Brophy's (1981) finding that praise correlates negatively (!)…”
Section: Praisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, gifted children are less likely to have the opportunity to learn from a model than average children (Bandura, 1986). Above all, children of the same age, who generally assume a particularly important modeling function (Hartup & Lougee, 1975;Schunk, 1987), cannot be optimally used as models by the gifted. All the more alarming was Brophy's (1981) finding that praise correlates negatively (!)…”
Section: Praisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer interaction is generally considered one of the factors that influence children's behavioral changes [22]. Peers' actions can lead to a positive or negative spillover effect and influence many aspects of children's lives [23,24]. Children are more likely to copy peers than adults [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%