2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelagic or insular? Genetic differentiation of rough-toothed dolphins in the Society Islands, French Polynesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This 'enhanced philopatry' could then lead to the striking geographic differentiation in mtDNA observed. A similar process of local fidelity has been proposed for insular communities of otherwise pelagic dolphins, due to an 'island mass' effect (Martien et al 2012;Oremus et al 2012).…”
Section: A Recent Worldwide Expansion Of Sperm Whalesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This 'enhanced philopatry' could then lead to the striking geographic differentiation in mtDNA observed. A similar process of local fidelity has been proposed for insular communities of otherwise pelagic dolphins, due to an 'island mass' effect (Martien et al 2012;Oremus et al 2012).…”
Section: A Recent Worldwide Expansion Of Sperm Whalesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The existence of genetic structure in S. bredanensis worldwide could be anticipated because the only previous genetic study on the species detected microscale population differentiation in French Polynesia (Oremus et al ., ). Restrictions to gene flow between two islands 170 km apart were observed using control region sequences (450 bp, F ST = 0.63, P < 0.001; Φ ST = 0.58, P < 0.001) and microsatellites (14 loci, F ST = 0.009, P < 0.001; R ST = 0.15, P < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Allendorf & Luikart, ). The population structure of S. bredanensis has been studied only in French Polynesia, where genetic differentiation was observed between two islands 170 km apart (Oremus et al ., ). The results of that study suggest site fidelity with little dispersal between populations, which is relevant for their conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Oremus et al . ). This is most problematic if juveniles are sampled because they have had fewer opportunities to disperse, or because they obtain benefits from gregariousness (Wilson ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To minimize this effect, population samples should adequately represent breeders in the putative populations of interest (Allendorf & Phelps 1981). In practice, however, this can be difficult to achieve, as closely related individuals aggregate in many species (Richard et al 1996;Hansen et al 1997;Oremus et al 2012). This is most problematic if juveniles are sampled because they have had fewer opportunities to disperse, or because they obtain benefits from gregariousness (Wilson 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%