2019
DOI: 10.20473/jd.v2i3.14290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembatasan Hak Mantan Terpidana Korupsi Sebagai Calon Anggota Legislatif Melalui Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum

Abstract: KPU merupakan sebuah lembaga untuk menyelenggarakan Pemilu. Pada setiap tahapan Pemilu KPU memiliki kewenangan untuk menetapkan Peraturan KPU. Sesuai dengan salah satu citacita Pemilu yaitu mengahasilkan wakil-wakil rakyat yang berkualitas dan semangat mewujudkan Pemerintah bersih dari korupsi. Pada pemilihan anggota legislatif 2019, KPU menetapkan peraturan KPU No. 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Pencalonan Anggota DPR, DPRD Provinsi, dan DPRD Kabupaten/Kota di Pemilu 2019. KPU menambahkan syarat untuk menjadi … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason why such a phenomenon exists is that the current mechanisms are not really effective in dealing with corruption cases. There are some mechanisms that were taken by the Indonesian government such as legislative candidate right's limitation through constitution and court (Vantri, 2019), creation of constitution for prevention and eradication of money laundering (Fitriyana, 2019), and other actions. Those preventive and repressive measures are considered to be good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason why such a phenomenon exists is that the current mechanisms are not really effective in dealing with corruption cases. There are some mechanisms that were taken by the Indonesian government such as legislative candidate right's limitation through constitution and court (Vantri, 2019), creation of constitution for prevention and eradication of money laundering (Fitriyana, 2019), and other actions. Those preventive and repressive measures are considered to be good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%