Penafsiran Ujaran Kebencian Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Beberapa Putusan Pengadilan

Abstract

Ujaran kebencian merupakan bentuk tindak pidana yang banyak terjadi khususnya terkait dengan situasi politik baik nasional maupun daerah. Meskipun sudah diatur dalam berbagai perundang-undangan, makna ujaran kebencian tersebut masih bersifat multitafsir. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif, diketahui bahwa yang dimaksud dengan ujaran kebencian seharusnya dimaknai dengan ujaran yang mengajak membenci seseorang indvidu atau kelompok masyarakat berdasarkan suku, agama, ras dan antar golongan, bukan pernyataan kebencian kepada seseorang atau sekelompok orang.

Lack of Critical Approach in the Hate Speech Research as Ideological Practice in Indonesia

“…Hate speech is also inseparable from issues of discrimination, this is because hate speech is often addressed to certain groups, such as religious, ethnic, racial and inter-group groups. Issues related to this discrimination can be seen in a study conducted by Ablisar et al [8]; Irawan, et al [13], Yuliansyah [14] Christianto [4] Anam & Hafiz [7], Gunawan [15] Kusumasari & Arifianto [16], Effendi [5], Wardhani & Ekawati [9], Marwa & Fadhlan [17], Mujab [1], Nurul F, Nurhadi, & Pranawa [18]; etc.…”

The Metaphor of Aceh Language on Instagram Social Media: Potential and Threats of Hate Speech in the Public Space

“…Based on Figure 1 above, it can be concluded that to process hate speech crimes, it must meet the criminal elements as regulated in Bill Of Act On Electronic Information And Transaction (UUITE) in conjunction with the Criminal Code. To prove a post contains hate speech, the police of the Republic of Indonesia submit it to a linguist to prove that the post contains a criminal element (Effendi, 2020). Preventive efforts related to hate speech, the police have launched virtual police where every post containing hate speech is given an electronic warning letter by the police (Maharani, 2021).…”