Pendant l’anesthésie générale, les mesures de sphygmo-oxymétrie prises sur le front ou le doigt sont comparables

Sugino, Shigekazu; Kanaya, Noriaki; Mizuuchi, Masahito; Nakayama, Masayasu; Namiki, Akiyoshi

doi:10.1007/bf03018304

Cited by 33 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The number and duration of alarm situations were significantly less with the forehead sensor than the finger sensor. Sugino et al 21 compared the forehead sensor with conventional finger sensors in anesthetized patients. They reported that forehead sensors had a shorter lag time than the finger sensor under an induced condition of low perfusion peripherally.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of forehead and digit oximetry in surgical/trauma patients at risk for decreased peripheral perfusion

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of forehead and digit oximetry in surgical/trauma patients at risk for decreased peripheral perfusion

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There are contradictory and controversial results regarding the accurate detection of SpO2 by pulse oximeter obtained from the related studies [ 13 – 16 ]. Nessler et al (2012) in their study concluded that among the patients under vasopressors, the forehead pulse oximeter sensor had higher accuracy in detection of SpO2 compared to transitional pulse oximetry of fingers [ 13 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this purpose, eighteen patients were induced by Propofol and time of lowest, time to recovery and lag time of beginning of SpO2 were measured for finger and forehead probes. The results showed that there are no differences between pulse oximetry of forehead and finger in terms of the mentioned times in a general anesthesia, and the authors suggested, the forehead probe can be a proper replacement when it is not possible to use finger probe [ 16 ]. Common methods such as forehead and finger probes have higher reliability in detection of peripheral oxygen saturation in patients with normal condition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of pulse oximetry in detection of oxygen saturation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of heart surgery: comparison of finger, toe, forehead and earlobe probes

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHeart surgery patients are more at risk of poor peripheral perfusion, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement is regular care for continuous analysis of blood oxygen saturation in these patients. With regard to controversial studies on accuracy of the current pulse oximetry probes and lack of data related to patients undergoing heart surgery, the present study was conducted to determine accuracy of pulse oximetry probes of finger, toe, forehead and earlobe in detection of oxygen saturation in patients admitted to intensive care units for coronary artery bypass surgery.MethodsIn this clinical trial, 67 patients were recruited based on convenience sampling method among those admitted to intensive care units for coronary artery bypass surgery. The SpO2 value was measured using finger, toe, forehead and earlobe probes and then compared with the standard value of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). Data were entered into STATA-11 software and analyzed using descriptive, inferential and Bland-Altman statistical analyses.ResultsHighest and lowest correlational mean values of SpO2 and SaO2 were related to finger and earlobe probes, respectively. The highest and lowest agreement of SpO2 and SaO2 were related to forehead and earlobe probes.ConclusionThe SpO2 of earlobe probes due to lesser mean difference, more limited confidence level and higher agreement ration with SaO2 resulted by arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis had higher accuracy. Thus, it is suggested to use earlobe probes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit for coronary artery bypass surgery.Trial registrationRegistration of this trial protocol has been approved in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials at 2018–03-19 with reference IRCT20100913004736N22. “Retrospectively registered.”

show abstract

“…The Nellcor TM Forehead SpO 2 sensor is a reflectance mode photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor that was developed to measure SpO 2 and HR at the forehead [6][7][8][9]. Studies of the saturation measurement of the use of this sensor on the forehead report it to be accurate, with measurements comparable to those acquired using traditional transmittance mode sensors on the finger [6,9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate at forearm using a Nellcor™ forehead SpO2-saturation sensor

Harju

Vehkaoja

Lindroos

et al. 2016

J Clin Monit Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alterations in arterial blood oxygen saturation, heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) are strongly associated with intra-hospital cardiac arrests and resuscitations. A wireless, easy-to-use, and comfortable method for monitoring these important clinical signs would be highly useful. We investigated whether the Nellcor™ OxiMask MAX-FAST forehead sensor could provide data for vital sign measurements when located at the distal forearm instead of its intended location at the forehead to provide improved comfortability and easy placement. In a prospective setting, we recruited 30 patients undergoing surgery requiring postoperative care. At the postoperative care unit, patients were monitored for two hours using a standard patient monitor and with a study device equipped with a Nellcor™ Forehead SpO sensor. The readings were electronically recorded and compared in post hoc analysis using Bland-Altman plots, Spearman's correlation, and root-mean-square error (RMSE). Bland-Altman plot showed that saturation (SpO) differed by a mean of -0.2 % points (SD, 4.6), with a patient-weighted Spearman's correlation (r) of 0.142, and an RMSE of 4.2 points. For HR measurements, the mean difference was 0.6 bpm (SD, 2.5), r = 0.997, and RMSE = 1.8. For RR, the mean difference was -0.5 1/min (4.1), r = 0.586, and RMSE = 4.0. The SpO readings showed a low mean difference, but also a low correlation and high RMSE, indicating that the Nellcor™ saturation sensor cannot reliably assess oxygen saturation at the forearm when compared to finger PPG measurements.

show abstract

Pendant l’anesthésie générale, les mesures de sphygmo-oxymétrie prises sur le front ou le doigt sont comparables

Abstract: P Pu ur rp po os se e: : To compare the performance of a forehead probe to a conventional finger pulse oximetry probe in anesthetized patients.

Cited by 33 publications

References 7 publications

Comparison of forehead and digit oximetry in surgical/trauma patients at risk for decreased peripheral perfusion

Comparison of forehead and digit oximetry in surgical/trauma patients at risk for decreased peripheral perfusion

Accuracy of pulse oximetry in detection of oxygen saturation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of heart surgery: comparison of finger, toe, forehead and earlobe probes

Determination of saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate at forearm using a Nellcor™ forehead SpO2-saturation sensor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About