Penerapan Sistem Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkoba (Studi Kasus di Polda Jateng)

Saputra, Hera; Chalim, Munsharif Abdul

doi:10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2630

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…33 Article 127 of the Narcotic Law 2009 has stated that a person who illegally uses narcotics can be subjected to a criminal and may lose its rehabilitation rights unless such a user can prove that he is not a criminal but a victim of narcotic abuse. 34 Proofing using narcotics illegally to be falling into victims of narcotics is problematic because it needs to look from the beginning of narcotics abuse by the person. 35 In addition, there is the fact that the user of illegal narcotics to be fallen into the victim's category should show that the person is encouraged, asked, cheated, and/or threatened to illegally use narcotics.…”

Section: B Discussion 1 the Legislation On Illegal Users Of Narcotic Under The Narcotic Law 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinction Between Victims and Criminals In Relation To Using Narcotics Illegally in Indonesia

Mahfud

Rani

Rizanizarli

2021

PLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is unprecedented that the Act Number 35, 2009 on Narcotics has incorporated the term of victims towards illegal users of narcotics which cannot be convicted for the crime and provided them with treatment at special rehabilitation center as worded in Article 103 (1) (b) of the Act. However, Article 103 (1) (a) of the Act also provides the possibility for those using narcotics illegally to be convicted. It causes law enforces might find it difficult to differentiate between victims and criminals concerning this violation. This research aims to discuss the definition of illegal narcotic users under the Narcotic Act 2009 and the criteria used by law enforcers in distinguishing between victims and criminals. This is a juridical normative research by using the method encompassing document analysis of the Narcotic Act 2009 and other relevant laws will be adopted in discussing the issue. This research reveals that the Act recognises the users of illegal narcotics as fully victims if they use narcotics with a certain amount for themselves only and considers the illegal narcotics users as criminals if they provide the substances for other people. The Act has governed illegal using of the substances in Articles 1 points (13), (15), 7, 111, 112, and 114. Surprisingly, the Act provided both fully victims and victims of being found guilty first treatment in the rehabilitation centre for certain period.

show abstract

Section: B Discussion 1 the Legislation On Illegal Users Of Narcotic Under The Narcotic Law 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinction Between Victims and Criminals In Relation To Using Narcotics Illegally in Indonesia

Mahfud

Rani

Rizanizarli

2021

PLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…issued Article 10 of the Criminal Code, which outlines the offences that drug suspects will be charged with. In recent years, drug misuse in Indonesia has escalated to a major problem and reached a worrying level, making it a national issue (Hera, 2018).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law Enforcement of Narcotics Abuse: Case Study of Investigation Process in Narcotics Criminal Acts in The Kolaka District National Narcotics Agency

Basrawi

Sukri

Mayasari

2023

J. Progressive. Law. Leg. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Narcotics abuse recently has always increased, not only among adults but also among adolescents and children. The cause of this abuse consists of two factors, namely factor internal and external. Therefore, cases of drug abuse are increasing every year. This study was conducted with the aim to find out the form of law enforcement against narcotics abusers in the process of investigating narcotics crimes. The research method used in this study was normative juridical approach which is supported by empirical juridical by detailing the description and collecting primary data through interviews. The results of this study show that there are two forms of law enforcement against narcotics abusers, namely repressive law enforcement and rehabilitative law enforcement as regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. Based on the interviews conducted, it is known that there are several obstacles in law enforcement on narcotics cases at the Kolaka National Narcotics Agency, namely the lack of personnel, the unresponsive community in providing information to investigators as the key to successful law enforcement and decreasing of operational costs in supporting facilities and infrastructure

show abstract

“…Suatu proses peradilan diakhir dengan jatuhnya putusan akhir (vonis) yang di dalamnya terdapat penjatuhan sanksi pidana (penghukuman) terhadap terdakwa yang bersalah dan di dalam putusan itu hakim menyatakan pendapatnya tentang apa yang telah dipertimbangkan dan apa yang menjadi amar putusannya. Sebelum sampai pada tahapan tersebut ada tahapan yang harus dilakukan sebelumnya, yaitu tahapan pembuktian dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap terdakwa (Saputra and Abdul Chalim 2018).…”

Section: Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap ...unclassified

Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020)

Domingo¹

2022

DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Law enforcement against narcotics abusers is also considered troubling because it does not create legal certainty. Namely the application of material criminal law by judges in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 in the Cassation decision on January 13, 2021 against the Defendant/Inmate Prasetyo Febriono. Then in legal considerations, the judge in passing a decision on case Number 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 in the Cassation decision dated January 13, 2021 against the defendant Prasetyo Febriono was not appropriate based on normative and sociological juridical considerations and by looking at valid evidence. Because Defendant III (Prasetyo Febriono) is a criminal act of Narcotics Abuse Category I for himself in accordance with Article 127 Paragraph (1) letter a of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and it is really the defendant who is guilty of doing it. The Panel of Judges based on the facts at the trial considered that the defendant could be held accountable for his actions with the consideration that at the time of committing his actions the defendant was aware of the consequences it caused and did not discourage his intentions, the perpetrator in carrying out his actions was in good physical condition and capable of considering elements against the law and there is no reason for the abolition of the crime. The research method used is normative legal research with a research approach that includes a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. From research conducted by researchers get the following results: 1). The application of material criminal law by the judge in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 in the Cassation Decision dated January 13, 2021 against the defendant/convict Prasetyo Febriono is not appropriate because Defendant III is a criminal act of narcotics abuse Category I for himself which is in accordance with Article 127 Paragraph (1) letter a of Law No. 35/2009 and it is really the defendant who is guilty of doing so. 2). As for legal considerations, the judge in ruling on case Number 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 in the Cassation decision dated January 13, 2021 against the defendant Prasetyo Febriono was not appropriate based on normative and sociological juridical considerations and by looking at valid evidence. Keywords: legal considerations; material criminal; narcotics abuse Abstrak Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika juga dinilai meresahkan karena tidak mewujudkan kepastian hukum. Yaitu penerapan hukum pidana materiil oleh hakim pada putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 dalam putusan Kasasi tanggal 13 Januari 2021 terhadap Terdakwa/Narapidana Prasetyo Febriono. Kemudian dalam pertimbangan hukum, hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pada perkara Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 dalam putusan Kasasi tanggal 13 Januari 2021 terhadap terdakwa Prasetyo Febriono tidak sesuai berdasarkan pertimbangan yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dan dengan melihat alat-alat bukti yang sah. Karena terdakwa III (Prasetyo Febriono), merupakan tindak pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika golongan I bagi diri sendiri yang sesuai dengan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) huruf a UU R.I No 35 tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika dan itu benar-benar terdakwalah yang bersalah melakukannya. Majelis Hakim berdasarkan fakta-fakta di persidangan menilai bahwa terdakwa dapat mempertanggung jawabkan perbuatannya dengan pertimbangan bahwa pada saat melakukan perbuatannya terdakwa sadar akan akibat yang di timbulkannya dan tidak mengurungkan niatnya, pelaku dalam melakukan perbuatannya dalam keadaan sehat jasmani dan cakap untuk mempertimbangkan unsur melawan hukum serta tidak adanya alasan penghapusan pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian meliputi pendekatan perundang–undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approaach). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: 1). Penerapan hukum pidana materil oleh hakim pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 dalam Putusan Kasasi tanggal 13 Januari 2021 terhadap terdakwa/narapidana Prasetyo Febriono tidak tepat karena terdakwa III, merupakan tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika Golongan I bagi diri sendiri yang sesuai dengan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) huruf a UU No.35/2009 dan itu benar-benar terdakwalah yang bersalah melakukannya. 2). Adapun pertimbangan hukum, hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pada perkara Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020 dalam putusan Kasasi tanggal 13 Januari 2021 terhadap terdakwa Prasetyo Febriono tidak sesuai berdasarkan pertimbangan yuridis normatif dan sosiologis dan dengan melihat alat-alat bukti yang sah. Kata kunci: penyalahgunaan narkotika; pertimbangan hukum; pidana materiil

show abstract

Penerapan Sistem Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkoba (Studi Kasus di Polda Jateng)

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Distinction Between Victims and Criminals In Relation To Using Narcotics Illegally in Indonesia

Distinction Between Victims and Criminals In Relation To Using Narcotics Illegally in Indonesia

Law Enforcement of Narcotics Abuse: Case Study of Investigation Process in Narcotics Criminal Acts in The Kolaka District National Narcotics Agency

Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 3790 K/PID.SUS/2020)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About