Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Teams Games Touraments   Dengan Permainan Monopoli Terhadap Hasil Belajar  Matematika Di SMK Kolese Tiara Bangsa

Suryani, Puji; Agustyaningrum, Nina; Hasibuan, Nailul Himmi

doi:10.33373/pythagoras.v8i2.2011

Cited by 3 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Six United States articles (Hulse et al, 2019 ; Ke, 2019 ; Moon and Ke, 2020 ; Ramani et al, 2020 ; Scalise et al, 2020 ; Thai et al, 2022 ), two articles from Spain (Jiménez et al, 2020 ; Zabala-Vargas et al, 2021 ), two articles from Greece (Altanis et al, 2018 ; Malliakas et al, 2021 ), two articles from South Africa (Delport, 2019 ; van Putten et al, 2020 ), and two articles from Taiwan (Yeh et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2021 ) were included. There was one article each from Australia (Vanbecelaere et al, 2020 ), China (Deng et al, 2020 ), Croatia (Juric et al, 2021 ), Finland (Kärki et al, 2021 ), Germany (Kiili et al, 2018 ), Hong Kong (Ting et al, 2019 ), Indonesia (Suryani et al, 2019 ), Ireland (Rocha and Dondio, 2021 ), Jordan (Al Khateeb, 2019 ; Baek and and Touati, 2020 ), Morocco (Tazouti et al, 2019 ), Portugal (Barros et al, 2020 ), Sweden (Alkhede and Holmqvist, 2021 ), and Turkey (Ilhan, 2021 ). Figure 2 shows the list of selected articles based on country.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of publishing year, two articles were published in 2018 (Altanis et al, 2018 ; Kiili et al, 2018 ). In 2019, nine articles were published (Al Khateeb, 2019 ; Delport, 2019 ; Hulse et al, 2019 ; Ke, 2019 ; Suryani et al, 2019 ; Tazouti et al, 2019 ; Ting et al, 2019 ; Yeh et al, 2019 ; Rocha and Dondio, 2021 ). Subsequently, there were eight publications in 2020 (Baek and and Touati, 2020 ; Barros et al, 2020 ; Deng et al, 2020 ; Jiménez et al, 2020 ; Moon and Ke, 2020 ; Scalise et al, 2020 ; Vanbecelaere et al, 2020 ; Juric et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were three sorts of research method used: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed. As shown in Figure 4 , there were 20 quantitative studies where 72% specifically used a quantitative approach (Kiili et al, 2018 ; Al Khateeb, 2019 ; Delport, 2019 ; Hulse et al, 2019 ; Suryani et al, 2019 ; Tazouti et al, 2019 ; Ting et al, 2019 ; Baek and and Touati, 2020 ; Barros et al, 2020 ; Jiménez et al, 2020 ; Ramani et al, 2020 ; Scalise et al, 2020 ; Vanbecelaere et al, 2020 ; Ilhan, 2021 ; Juric et al, 2021 ; Kärki et al, 2021 ; Liu et al, 2021 ; Malliakas et al, 2021 ; Zabala-Vargas et al, 2021 ; Thai et al, 2022 ). Six studies (21%) employed a mixed methods approach (Altanis et al, 2018 ; Ke, 2019 ; Yeh et al, 2019 ; Moon and Ke, 2020 ; Juric et al, 2021 ; Rocha and Dondio, 2021 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2019; Yeh et al, 2019;Baek and and Touati, 2020;Barros et al, 2020;Deng et al, 2020;Marín-Díaz et al, 2020;Moon and Ke, 2020;Ramani et al, 2020;Vanbecelaere et al, 2020;Juric et al, 2021;Kärki et al, 2021;Rocha and Dondio, 2021;Zabala-Vargas et al, 2021;Thai et al, 2022). Only five studies (18%) employed nondigital games (Suryani et al, 2019;Scalise et al, 2020;Alkhede and Holmqvist, 2021;Juric et al, 2021;Malliakas et al, 2021). Figure 7 shows the number of articles by type of game used.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students' cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review

Hui

Mahmud

2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionGame-based learning (GBL) is one of the modern trends in education in the 21st century. Numerous research studies have been carried out to investigate the influence of teaching on the students' academic attainment. It is crucial to integrate the cognitive and affective domains into teaching and learning strategies. This study aims to review journal articles from 2018 to 2022 concerning the influence of GBL in mathematics T&L on the students' cognitive and affective domains.MethodsA research methodology based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was used for the survey on the basis of the Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases wherein 773 articles relating to game-based learning (GBL) in mathematics were discovered. Based on the study topic, study design, study technique, and analysis, only 28 open-access articles were chosen for further evaluation. Two types of cognitive domain and five types of affective domain were identified as related to the implications of GBL on the students' T&L of mathematics.ResultsThe study results show that GBL has positively impacted students when they are learning mathematics. It is comprised of two types of cognitive domain (knowledge and mathematical skills) and five types of affective domain (achievement, attitude, motivation, interest, and engagement). The findings of this study are anticipated to encourage educators in the classrooms more effectively.DiscussionGBL in education is now one of the major learning trends of the 21st century. Since 2019, the number of studies relating to game-based learning has increased. There is an influence on the cognitive and affective domains due to T&L Mathematics utilizing a game-based learning (GBL) approach.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students' cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review

Hui

Mahmud

2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students’ mathematics learning outcomes

RİDWAN¹,

HADİ²

2022

Participatory Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperative learning takes place when students work together in small groups to help each other comprehend a subject. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of cooperative learning on vocational high school students' mathematics learning results compared to those that pertain to conventional learning. Data from 22 research studies, including the sample size, standard deviation, and mean for both the experimental and control groups and other information, were collected using descriptive analysis. The data analysis technique used meta-analysis on forest plots, with analytical techniques including heterogeneity testing, effect size calculation, summary effect calculation using a random-effects model, and identification of publication bias. The results showed that the effectiveness of cooperative learning was 0.89, which gave a medium effect on the mathematics learning outcomes of vocational high school students. The cooperative learning model also provides a measure of higher effectiveness in grade 11 than grade 10 and learning at a sample size of 1-30 students compared to more than 30 students. The effectiveness of cooperative learning on mathematics learning outcomes in the medium effect category, on the other hand, is dependent on grade level variables and sample size. This meta-analysis research provides information to teachers in Indonesia to implement cooperative learning based on the level and number of students in the class to improve the mathematics learning outcomes of vocational high school students.

show abstract

Advances in the Contributions of Mathematics in the Field of Education and Psychology

Méndez,

Pedro Martínez-Ramón,

Lagos San Martín

et al. 2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Teams Games Touraments Dengan Permainan Monopoli Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Di SMK Kolese Tiara Bangsa

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students' cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review

Influence of game-based learning in mathematics education on the students' cognitive and affective domain: A systematic review

A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students’ mathematics learning outcomes

Advances in the Contributions of Mathematics in the Field of Education and Psychology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About