Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Daerah Menggunakan Pendekatan Regulasi

Abstract

One of the increasing trends in the era of regional autonomy is the regional extension both at the provincial level and at district/city level. However, such situation in some cases has emerged some new problems, such as: social conflict, conflict on natural resources and conflict in the regional boundaries. This study examines the problems; first, what factors are causing the dispute on the boundaries in the extension of new autonomous region? Second, how is the pattern of the settlement of boundary dispute provided in the Indonesian legal system? Third, what is the role of the Government in solving the boundary dispute? This is a juridical-empirical research. The study concluded that: First, the boundary dispute has been triggered by the area extension process not requiring the border as a legal requirement in the area expansion. The requirements fulfilled were more technical, physical and political. Second, the pattern of the boundary dispute resolution generally is through two ways: the non-legal border dispute resolution, and legal settlement. In non-legal resolution, it was mediated by MOHA and Governors; while, in the legal dispute resolution it reached through a judicial review to the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court. Third, in the dispute of area border, the government's role was the facilitator in accordance with the level of its dispute case.

Penyelesaian Sengketa Tapal Batas Antara Desa Jasri dengan Desa Perasi Melalui Upaya Mediasi

“…141 Tahun 2017(Puspitaningrum, 2020. Sedangkan Arifin (2016) penyelesaian sengketa batas daerah dapat dilakukan secara non hukum, dan penyelesaian secara hukum. Secara non hukum dimediasi oleh Kemendagri dan Gubernur.…”

Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Wilayah Antara Kabupaten Lombok Tengah dan Kabupaten Lombok Barat

“…Secara prosedur persoalan sengketa segmen batas wilayah yang terjadi antara kabupaten/kota harus dimediasi terlebih dahulu oleh pemerintah provinsi maupun oleh pemerintah pusat. Kalaupun tidak ada kepastian, 9 Yana Sahyana (2019) Mahkamah Agung dapat dianalogikan sebagai puncak perjuangan keadilan bagi setiap warga negara. Hakekat fungsinya berbeda dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang tidak berhubungan dengan tuntutan keadilan bagi warga negara.…”

Political Territorial Boundary Dispute (Kupang City and Kupang Regency)

“…Ministry of Home Affairs, states that since 1999, out of 33 provinces, only 11 of them have completed or implemented territorial boundary affirmations and only 42 districts / cities out of a total of 465 districts / cities have confirmed their territorial boundaries. For provinces it has disputed regional boundaries, there are 19 regions and 81 cities / regencies, (Arifin, 2016). This is usually due to a juridical aspect, namely the unclear regional boundaries in the statute attachments and the statute appendix maps that did not qualify as maps, cultural aspects (issues of separation of ethnicity or sub-ethnicity), political aspects (relating to the number of voters and votes acquired by members of the political elite such as the DPRD or others), social aspects such as the emergence of social jealousy between local residents and immigrants.…”

“…Research by Nanang Kristiono on "Conflict Confirmation of Regional Boundary Between Magelang City and Magelang Regency" (Analysis of Causes and Impact Factors), (Kristiyono, 2008 (Osyikar, 2014). Research by Arifin on "Settlement of regional border disputes using a regulatory approach", (Arifin, 2016 The research in this article basically the researcher takes a different position in several respects with previous studies where this research emphasizes on analyzing the territorial boundary dispute between Kupang Regency and Kupang City in Nasipanaf area regarding (1) the Role of the East Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government in efforts to resolve territorial boundaries disputes between Kupang Regency and Kupang City. (2) What are the impacts on the society from protracted territorial boundaries disputes.…”