2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide Orientation at Emulsion Nanointerfaces Dramatically Different from Flat Surfaces

Abstract: The adsorption of protein to nanoparticles plays an important role in toxicity, food science, pharmaceutics, and biomaterial science. Understanding how proteins bind to nanophase surfaces is instrumental for understanding and, ultimately, controlling nanoparticle (NP) biochemistry. Techniques probing the adsorption of proteins at NP interfaces exist; however, these methods have been unable to determine the orientation and folding of proteins at these interfaces. For the first time, we probe in situ with sum fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the SFG spectra, two features were fit between 1660 and 1685 cm –1 , assigned to high α-helical content (the most predominate feature) and protein aggregation, respectively. , In contrast to the SFS spectra, here, the predominant feature that relates the lysozyme to a phospholipid nanoparticle is the peak near 1685 cm –1 , suggesting that the bound lysozyme is also aggregated to a higher degree than for the case at the air–water interface. Of course, this is only one possibility, as we have previously found that small peptides bound to nanoparticles can adopt very different orientations due to extra Coulombic forces by lysozymes on the opposite side of the nanoparticle, which are absent in the case of planar air–water interfaces . Here, the comparison between the lipid nanoparticle and lipid planar surface is only an estimate as the subtraction method we employed to extract the amide I spectra can distort the peak shapes obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the SFG spectra, two features were fit between 1660 and 1685 cm –1 , assigned to high α-helical content (the most predominate feature) and protein aggregation, respectively. , In contrast to the SFS spectra, here, the predominant feature that relates the lysozyme to a phospholipid nanoparticle is the peak near 1685 cm –1 , suggesting that the bound lysozyme is also aggregated to a higher degree than for the case at the air–water interface. Of course, this is only one possibility, as we have previously found that small peptides bound to nanoparticles can adopt very different orientations due to extra Coulombic forces by lysozymes on the opposite side of the nanoparticle, which are absent in the case of planar air–water interfaces . Here, the comparison between the lipid nanoparticle and lipid planar surface is only an estimate as the subtraction method we employed to extract the amide I spectra can distort the peak shapes obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this is only one possibility, as we have previously found that small peptides bound to nanoparticles can adopt very different orientations due to extra Coulombic forces by lysozymes on the opposite side of the nanoparticle, which are absent in the case of planar air−water interfaces. 29 Here, the comparison between the lipid nanoparticle and lipid planar surface is only an estimate as the subtraction method we employed to extract the amide I spectra can distort the peak shapes obtained. Furthermore, the orientation and structure of a protein at an interface gives rather unique spectra, and for the case of planar SFG, various methods to calculate experimental spectra have be developed to extract such information.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations