“…Multiple reviews in the literature detail the various strengths and weaknesses of treatment technologies for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-impacted matrices, and are either a general assessment of PFAS-relevant treatment technologies (Anderson et al, 2021;Garg et al, 2021;Mahinroosta & Senevirathna, 2020;Merino et al, 2016;Riegel & Sacher, 2020;Ross et al, 2019Ross et al, , 2018Wanninayake, 2021) or a focus on a particular mechanism, such as adsorption (Boyer et al, 2021;Dixit et al, 2021;Gagliano et al, 2020;Uriakhil et al, 2021;Zhang D. Q. et al, 2019) or various forms of destruction (Cui et al, 2020;Horst et al, 2020;Nzeribe et al, 2019; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, 2020a; Winchell et al, 2020;. Independent of the purpose of the review, a similar conclusion is drawn: an appropriate treatment strategy for PFAS-impacted waste includes multiple treatment technologies in series to concentrate PFAS into the smallest possible volume for energy-intensive destruction.…”