2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substance remediation from soil and sorbents: A review of adsorption behaviour and ultrasonic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 287 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, soil flushing does not require mobilization of materials but rather the injection of the extraction fluid on-site and its subsequent recovery [283]. Some highly water-soluble PFAS such as PFOS, PFOA or PFHxS are amenable to water solubilization while other methods such as ultrasounds, the use of organic solvents and amendments such as chelating agents, acids or surfactants might be necessary to extract other PFAS substances with higher hydrophobicity [284][285][286][287]. Two studies conducted on PFOS have shown removal efficiencies greater than 99%, with slight lower decreases in sandy clay soils (94% in comparison to 99% removal in presence of sandy soils) [279].…”
Section: Remediation Technologies For Treatment Of Pfas-contaminated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, soil flushing does not require mobilization of materials but rather the injection of the extraction fluid on-site and its subsequent recovery [283]. Some highly water-soluble PFAS such as PFOS, PFOA or PFHxS are amenable to water solubilization while other methods such as ultrasounds, the use of organic solvents and amendments such as chelating agents, acids or surfactants might be necessary to extract other PFAS substances with higher hydrophobicity [284][285][286][287]. Two studies conducted on PFOS have shown removal efficiencies greater than 99%, with slight lower decreases in sandy clay soils (94% in comparison to 99% removal in presence of sandy soils) [279].…”
Section: Remediation Technologies For Treatment Of Pfas-contaminated ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ultrasonic cleaning equipment can also cause surface damage to mechanical equipment due to long-term operation. Therefore, exploring the frequency limits of cleaning different fruits and vegetables is crucial to optimize the ultrasonic cleaning process [ 116 ].…”
Section: Shortcomings and Perspectives Of Ultrasound Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple reviews in the literature detail the various strengths and weaknesses of treatment technologies for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-impacted matrices, and are either a general assessment of PFAS-relevant treatment technologies (Anderson et al, 2021;Garg et al, 2021;Mahinroosta & Senevirathna, 2020;Merino et al, 2016;Riegel & Sacher, 2020;Ross et al, 2019Ross et al, , 2018Wanninayake, 2021) or a focus on a particular mechanism, such as adsorption (Boyer et al, 2021;Dixit et al, 2021;Gagliano et al, 2020;Uriakhil et al, 2021;Zhang D. Q. et al, 2019) or various forms of destruction (Cui et al, 2020;Horst et al, 2020;Nzeribe et al, 2019; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, 2020a; Winchell et al, 2020;. Independent of the purpose of the review, a similar conclusion is drawn: an appropriate treatment strategy for PFAS-impacted waste includes multiple treatment technologies in series to concentrate PFAS into the smallest possible volume for energy-intensive destruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%