1993
DOI: 10.1080/01434632.1993.9994550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived ethnolinguistic vitality of Vietnamese and English in Australia: A confirmatory factor analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent updates of this theory, e.g. the Subjective Vitality Questionnaire (SVQ) (Bourhis et al ., 1981) and the 'Beliefs on Ethnolinguistic Vitality Questionnaire' (BEVQ) (Landry & Allard, 1986) have become useful tools in the investigation of interethnic group relations (see for example Karahan, 2004;Landry et al , 1996;Willemyns et al , 1993;Yagmur et al , 1999).…”
Section: Ethnolinguistic Vitalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent updates of this theory, e.g. the Subjective Vitality Questionnaire (SVQ) (Bourhis et al ., 1981) and the 'Beliefs on Ethnolinguistic Vitality Questionnaire' (BEVQ) (Landry & Allard, 1986) have become useful tools in the investigation of interethnic group relations (see for example Karahan, 2004;Landry et al , 1996;Willemyns et al , 1993;Yagmur et al , 1999).…”
Section: Ethnolinguistic Vitalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of studies have tested the usefulness of the concept of EV as a research tool (Abrams, Barker, and Giles 2009;Bourhis and Sachdev 1984;Giles, Rosenthal, and Young 1985;Pittam, Gallois, and Willemyns 1991;Willemyns, Pittam, and Gallois 1993). The findings of these studies have shown strong empirical support for the socialÁpsychological nature of the concepts of both objective and perceived EV.…”
Section: Vitality Variablesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Johnson, Giles and Bourhis (1983) argue that objective and subjective vitality provide a startingpoint from which the difficult link between sociological (collective) and social psychological (individual) accounts of language, ethnicity, and inter-group relations can be explored. In the last decade, empirical work has begun to test the usefulness of the concept of ethnolinguistic vitality as a research tool (e.g., Bourhis and Sachdev, 1984;Giles, Rosenthal and Young, 1985;Pittam, Gallois and Willemyns, 1991;Willemyns, Pittam and Gallois, 1993;Yagmur, De Bot and Korzilius, 1999). The findings from these studies claim strong empirical support for the social psychological nature of the concepts of both objective and perceived ethnolinguistic vitality, but there is also considerable discussion of various aspects of the theory and its application in empirical research.…”
Section: Ethnolinguistic Vitality and Language Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%