Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2077451.2077468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceiving human motion variety

Abstract: Figure 1: The experiment stimuli and their creation -the stimuli as presented to the subject (top) and their creation, with trajectories and characters coloured according to their respective animations (bottom). In the depicted trial, the gold standard is shown on left. Figure 2: Trajectory optimisation -random trajectories result in a large number of intersections (1), causing many collisions (2). Our optimisation approach ensures a collision-free scenario (3, 4). AbstractIn order to simulate plausible groups… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Reitsma and 2003), experiments with human observers were conducted to determine the sensitivity of human perception to physical errors in motions and (Hodgins et al, 1998) investigated, which types of anomalies added to the motion disturb human perception the most. In (Pražák and O'Sullivan, 2011) and (McDonnell et al, 2008) human crowd variety was investigated and influence of either motion or shape clones on the whole crowd perception was investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Reitsma and 2003), experiments with human observers were conducted to determine the sensitivity of human perception to physical errors in motions and (Hodgins et al, 1998) investigated, which types of anomalies added to the motion disturb human perception the most. In (Pražák and O'Sullivan, 2011) and (McDonnell et al, 2008) human crowd variety was investigated and influence of either motion or shape clones on the whole crowd perception was investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McDonnell et al [1], [5] have studied the effects of different types of appearance and motion variation on the perceptibility of visual clones in crowds, while Pražák et al [2] demonstrated how only three different human motions replicated evenly through a crowd. Hoyet et al [6] evaluated the distinctiveness and attractiveness of different types of human motion and found that average motions were the least distinctive and most attractive, consistent with findings in face perception [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perception of varied human appearance and motion have previously been studied in this Note: This work was done while all authors were at Disney Research context [1], [2], but to date, body shape variation has received less attention. However, two of the most functionally relevant and visually salient features of any crowd are the shapes and sizes of the people in it, and their relative distributions: i.e., under normal circumstances most people will have shapes close to the median of the population, and there will be decreasing numbers of more atypical bodies present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect to consider when increasing individualism, is the relevance of motion variety. In [PO11] perception studies were carried out to determine how people detect motion clones. Table 1 summarizes the crowd rendering approaches discussed in previous sections, considering the underlying representation and an-imation technique.…”
Section: Clothing and Crowd Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both approaches thus benefit from matrix compression techniques. It is also possible to reduce the frequency at which animations are updated with no visible artefacts [PO11, MNO07].…”
Section: Character Animationmentioning
confidence: 99%