We report a study of adventure sports (AS) professionals working in mountaineering, climbing, skiing, kayaking and mountain biking. This paper expands work on professional judgment and decision-making. The article examines the Pro-Active Coping (PAC) strategies used by AS coaches and leaders to manage the cognitive loads of decision-making. A mixed methodology was employed in which a sample of participants completed a PAC Inventory and a sub-group then completed an Applied Cognitive Task Analysis to examine a typical coaching scenario. The study determines that the participants manage their cognitive load in practice with a range of heuristics, avoidance strategies and instrumental support. These include using their own communities of practice, anticipation of events that may cause high acute cognitive load (anticipation planning) and the development of a 'straw-man plan' based on anticipated environmental conditions and client abilities.That plan is subsequently modified in response to the actual conditions and client abilities as observed. These strategies reduce the depletion of the coaches' own cognitive resources by managing the demands throughout the coaching and leadership process. We conclude that the coaches and leaders are aware of the extent of their cognitive resources and manage their expenditure, both of which are indicative of high meta-cognitive ability. 3 Research in this journal has recently examined the planning and focus of coaches working in hyper-dynamic environments, a situation characterised by multiple interrelating or even unmanageable factors (Collins & Collins, 2016a, 2016b). This situation is described as 'a wicked mess' by Simon, Carson and Collins (2017) and identified by Collins and Collins as causing a high cognitive load. These loads are associated with developing the performance of individuals in continually changing and potentially risky environments. In associated work, Collins, Carson and Collins (2016) identified meta-cognition as a key aspect of the coaching and leadership processes in general. Simon, Collins and Collins (2017) suggest that the complexity of coaching in these contexts is a consequence of the synergies among three linked aspects of the coaching process: (1) the hyperdynamic environment, (2) the individual being coached and (3) the desired outcomes. Consequently, coaches of AS experience high cognitive loads while simultaneously anticipating, planning and coping within this messy hyper-dynamic context while also attempting to facilitate the development of their students. Cognitive load is the amount of information processing required to perform a given task (Reif, 2010). Cognitive load theory (Sweller , 1998) would assert that decision making would be hampered if working memory capacity is exceeded (De Jong, 2010.) The coaches are susceptible to high cognitive loads that can be acute and chronic. The coach must have the capacity to anticipate acute stressors caused by factors like an unexpected change in conditions or an emergency while also managing chronic...