2015
DOI: 10.5232/ricyde2015.03901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceiving movement patterns: Implications for skill evaluation, correction and development. [Percepción de los patrones de movimiento: Implicaciones para la evaluación, corrección y el desarrollo de habilidades].

Abstract: Skill practitioners such as coaches, judges, and rehabilitation specialists rely heavily on the visual observation of movement to analyse performance, concomitantly performers of movement rely heavily on kinaesthetic sensitivity to produce movements of desired precision. The observation of movement errors (by coaches or therapists) and the correction of movement errors (by performers or patients) depend on fundamentally different perceptual systems that may differ in their sensitivity, units of control and tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, evaluators performing visual observation of the performance might perceive (and evaluate) this variation in back squat execution as incorrect due to the lack of an appropriate reference or even perceive small functional motion variability as disarrangements [ 62 , 63 ]. To avoid additional sources of misinterpretation in the analysis of the movement by evaluators, the current study recruited a single group of experienced male lifters, but even in this category of participants (i.e., advanced), there are qualitative motor differences during the execution [ 33 , 73 ] that might contribute to the disagreement of judgement between evaluators. Finally, future research should focus on analysing subjects’ movements in three dimensions rather than just in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, evaluators performing visual observation of the performance might perceive (and evaluate) this variation in back squat execution as incorrect due to the lack of an appropriate reference or even perceive small functional motion variability as disarrangements [ 62 , 63 ]. To avoid additional sources of misinterpretation in the analysis of the movement by evaluators, the current study recruited a single group of experienced male lifters, but even in this category of participants (i.e., advanced), there are qualitative motor differences during the execution [ 33 , 73 ] that might contribute to the disagreement of judgement between evaluators. Finally, future research should focus on analysing subjects’ movements in three dimensions rather than just in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profiling performers is not new and, unsurprisingly, the coaches employed a range of observation and questioning strategies (Giblin, Farrow, Ball, & Abernethey, 2015). These appear highly individualised, both towards the performer and coach (McGarry, 2009) with coaches having preferred approaches, questions and assumptions based on their experiences and forming a set of highly personal heuristics built within the absolutes mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert coaches have the ability to recognise relevant patterns faster and with more accuracy than novices. 15,16 This pattern recognition derived from an extensive foundation of highly specialised declarative and procedural knowledge, makes them a valuable knowledge source. 16 Understanding the informational constraints that regulate goal-directed behaviour in rugby by using rich descriptions from experiential knowledge sources will support an explanation of performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%