The determination of tritiated thymidine labeling index and the percentage of cells with S phase DNA content was performed on cell suspensions obtained from 69 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The distributions of cells in the cell cycle by computer analysis of flow cytometric data were obtained by two mathematical procedures: the widely adopted Fried model and a new one proposed by Bruni et al. A significant agreement was observed by checking the Spearman index 0s) between the percentages of cells in the different cell cycle phases (Gall, r, = 0.76; S, r, = 0.60; and Gz+M, rs = 0.43; p < 0.001) determined by the two procedures. Similarly, a good correlation was observed between the labeling index &I) and the S phase values obtained by the Fried (rs = 0.45, p < 0.001) and Bruni (r, = 0.69, p < 0.001) models, but with a higher Recent findings have shown the relevance of tritiated thymidine labeling index (LI) as a prognostic discriminant in the human tumor types analyzed (7,9,15,20,22,23,33). In non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) the kinetic variable proved to be closely related to long-term clinical outcome (7,24,28,31). Thus it is important to search for a rapid and reproducible indicator of potential proliferative activity as an alternative to LI. Several recent papers have suggested that the S phase fraction, evaluated by flow cytometry, meets these requisites (1)(2)(3)(4)12,13,27,29,30). With the present study we proposed to compare the prognostic relevance of LI and S-fraction on the same series of patients with NHL. The S-fraction as well as Go/l and GZ+M fractions were quantified by using two different computer procedures: the more conventional, proposed by Fried (17,181, and the one recently proposed by Bruni et al. (5). A comparison between the potentials of the two procedures was carried out on cell suspensions obtained from 69 NHL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell SuspensionsPathologic lymph nodes from 69 adult patients with NHL were analyzed: 59 at the time of diagnosis (unagreement for the latter one. The S phase by the Bruni model was also superior in predicting LI: in fact, by employing the S cutoff value of U%, a better agreement between low LI and low S phase or high LI and high S phase was observed with the Bruni procedure (90%) than with the Fried model (72%). Finally, the analysis of the prognostic significance of the different kinetic variables confirmed the prognostic relevance of LI at any time; the S phase percentage as determined by Bruni et al. was discriminant of survival only at shorter times, and no prognostic significance could be ascribed to S phase according to the Fried procedure.