2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception-Action Coupling in Usage of Telepresence Cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This visibility problem is all the more pertinent in a real-world scenario, where it would be common to have the robot placed at a remote location from the user. Valiton et al [44] have studied this problem in more detail by evaluating camera selection and placement strategies with relation to the time to complete the tasks and the cognitive load. The results are however highly user-dependent, and further studies on the topic are necessary with possible decision support from learned models of camera preference to help the operators.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This visibility problem is all the more pertinent in a real-world scenario, where it would be common to have the robot placed at a remote location from the user. Valiton et al [44] have studied this problem in more detail by evaluating camera selection and placement strategies with relation to the time to complete the tasks and the cognitive load. The results are however highly user-dependent, and further studies on the topic are necessary with possible decision support from learned models of camera preference to help the operators.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User-centered work, in contrast, started from the abilities and needs of the operator and built interfaces with them in mind. Showcasing the potential of this approach, we highlight classic and recent examples for human-centered and non-expert teleoperation interface design [e.g., for manipulation ( Herlant et al, 2016 ; Kent et al, 2017 ; Li et al, 2017 ; Rakita et al, 2017 ), shared autonomy ( Jain et al, 2015 ; Aronson et al, 2018 ; Rakita et al, 2019b ; Jeon et al, 2020 ; Nicolis, 2020 ), camera control ( Rakita et al, 2018 ; Rakita et al, 2019a ), and social and psychological interfaces ( Rea et al, 2017a ; Rea and Young, 2018 ; Rea and Young, 2019a ; Rea et al, 2020 ; Seo et al, 2020 ; Valiton and Li, 2020 )], we call for teleoperation and robot researchers broadly to use more additional advanced applications of user-centered practices by starting with user-driven solutions in addition to existing technically-driven approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%