2007
DOI: 10.1159/000112650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions and Beliefs concerning Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Physicians and Patients Disagree

Abstract: Background/Aim: There is insufficient evidence to support an association between lifestyle and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Furthermore, perceptions concerning the impact of GERD on lifestyle are largely unknown. We aimed at investigating physicians’ perceptions about GERD and lifestyle and at evaluating physician-patient agreement concerning the impact of GERD on the quality of life. Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to all Danish primary care physicians (n = 3,603, response rate 36%) and to all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its implementation depends basically on the physician judging the impact of the symptoms relayed to him by the patient as being or not being troublesome. It is reasonable to surmise that questions about symptom frequency, severity and impact on the patient would have been incorporated into most physicians' anamnesis years ago, and yet there continues to be discordance between physicians' and patients' respective subjective impressions, with disease severity being generally underestimated [11,12,24]. The use of patient-administered questionnaires can thus help physicians ascertain the patients' symptoms more objectively and decide whether such symptoms are indeed troublesome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its implementation depends basically on the physician judging the impact of the symptoms relayed to him by the patient as being or not being troublesome. It is reasonable to surmise that questions about symptom frequency, severity and impact on the patient would have been incorporated into most physicians' anamnesis years ago, and yet there continues to be discordance between physicians' and patients' respective subjective impressions, with disease severity being generally underestimated [11,12,24]. The use of patient-administered questionnaires can thus help physicians ascertain the patients' symptoms more objectively and decide whether such symptoms are indeed troublesome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting data from controlled clinical studies are limited but recommendations included in the latest evidence‐based guidelines include weight loss, smoking cessation, elevating the head of the bed, avoiding dietary triggers (high‐fat, spicy and acidic foods) and not eating close to bedtime 38 . However, evidence suggests that lifestyle advice may not be routinely implemented in general practice 39–41 . Clinicians often incorrectly assume that patients are aware of what constitutes a healthy diet and lifestyle.…”
Section: Personalised Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…advice may not be routinely implemented in general practice. [39][40][41] Clinicians often incorrectly assume that patients are aware of what constitutes a healthy diet and lifestyle. Perhaps this is because initiating and monitoring behaviour change, especially weight loss, requires motivational interviewing skills, regular contact and encouragement beyond what is feasible in the context of a brief consultation.…”
Section: Lifestyle Advicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] Additionally, there is usually disagreement between a physician and patient regarding the disease severity, treatment outcome, and the impact on quality of life. [ 14 15 16 ] Moreover, there is a knowledge gap and practice differences in GERD management patients between family physicians and gastroenterologists,[ 17 18 ] and between residents and consultants. [ 19 20 ] Despite these challenges, local data on the physician awareness of GERD management in Saudi Arabia are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%