2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions of physical and psychological aggression in close relationships: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
3
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
45
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in ratings of harmfulness between partner and stranger conditions for 'Evolved Negs', in contrast to previous findings suggesting that negging may be viewed as more harmful between partners (Williams, Richardson, Hammock & Janit, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were no differences in ratings of harmfulness between partner and stranger conditions for 'Evolved Negs', in contrast to previous findings suggesting that negging may be viewed as more harmful between partners (Williams, Richardson, Hammock & Janit, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Siltala (2014) investigated the impact of emotional, sexual, and physical abuse in 1,952 people, finding that victims of emotional abuse scored lower on all measures of wellbeing than victims of sexual or physical abuse. Williams, Richardson, Hammock and Janit (2012) found that victims of domestic abuse viewed emotional abuse as more harmful with longer-lasting effects, however observers viewed physical abuse as more harmful and deserving of punishment. This suggests that members of the public may not recognise the impact of emotional abuse, highlighting the importance of understanding the public perception of behaviours such as negging.…”
Section: Emotional Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parece un razonamiento obvio suponer que, los observadores de una situación de violencia perciben la de tipo físico con mayor severidad, y la juzgan de manera más intolerable e intransigente, debido a sus manifiestas lesiones (Capezza y Arriaga, 2008). En cambio, cuando se trata de actores o víctimas, ocurre lo contrario, estimándose la agresión psicológica más nociva, así como también, sus secuelas se consideran más perdurables en el tiempo (Williams, Richardson, Hammock, y Janit, 2012). La distancia psicológica -definida como el conjunto de experiencias asociadas con estar cerca o lejos de algo o alguien subjetivo-sería la responsable de tales diferencias entre actor-observador (Van Boven, Kane, McGraw, y Dale, 2010).…”
Section: Violencia Hacia La Pareja Distancia Social Y Perdónunclassified
“…Esto va en consonancia con investigaciones previas, las cuales muestran, que la violencia psicológica es menos ostensible que la física, debido al tipo de comportamientos que la conciben (p.ej., celos) (Williams et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tabla 2 Coeficientes De Regresión No Estandarizados Erroreunclassified
“…This is not only true within the field but also within couples themselves, as Caetano, Field, Ramisetty-Mikler, and Lipsky (2009) found that over half of the couples they interviewed disagreed about what constituted psychological aggression. Although psychological aggression is often viewed as a less injurious form of aggression than physical tactics (see Williams, Richardson, Hammock, & Janit, 2012), victims of psychological aggression have reported that it is actually more harmful than physical aggression, in part because its effects tend to be much longer lasting.…”
Section: Psychological Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%