2019
DOI: 10.5455/apd.40824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptions toward Criminals Scale: the reliability and validity analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The total variance of the scale and item net values correspond to the standard required for the structural validity of the scale. 36,37 The CFA supported the nine-factor scale structure yielded by the EFA. In this study, it was determined that RMSEA, SRMR, and TLI values were good fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The total variance of the scale and item net values correspond to the standard required for the structural validity of the scale. 36,37 The CFA supported the nine-factor scale structure yielded by the EFA. In this study, it was determined that RMSEA, SRMR, and TLI values were good fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The nine factors in the original PrAS were also classified as nine factors in this study. The total variance of the scale and item net values correspond to the standard required for the structural validity of the scale 36,37 . The CFA supported the nine‐factor scale structure yielded by the EFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations