2001
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual Categorization of Cat and Dog Silhouettes by 3- to 4-Month-Old Infants

Abstract: Given evidence that silhouette information can be used by adults to form categorical representations at the basic level, four experiments utilizing the familiarization-novelty preference procedure were performed to examine whether 3-and 4-month-old infants could form categorical representations for cats versus dogs from the perceptual information available in silhouettes (e.g., global shape and external outline). Experiments 1 and 2 showed that infants could form individuated categorical representations for ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
59
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
6
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following longer viewing, dishabituation was observed with novel body cues as well as novel head cues. Preferential responding to head cues was also found with silhouettes of the stimuli by Quinn, Eimas, and Tarr (2001). There are two possible interpretations of this result: it could derive from objective properties of the parts of the stimuli-there might simply be more information present in the head partor it could derive from a preference for looking at faces, which is evident in human infants from a very young age (e.g., Valenza, Simion, Cassia, & Umilta, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Following longer viewing, dishabituation was observed with novel body cues as well as novel head cues. Preferential responding to head cues was also found with silhouettes of the stimuli by Quinn, Eimas, and Tarr (2001). There are two possible interpretations of this result: it could derive from objective properties of the parts of the stimuli-there might simply be more information present in the head partor it could derive from a preference for looking at faces, which is evident in human infants from a very young age (e.g., Valenza, Simion, Cassia, & Umilta, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the category representation of humans by infants appears to be based on the overall structure of the stimuli-for example, a head region adjoining an elongated body axis with skeletal appendages (Quinn, 2004). The finding that the human representation is based on global information contrasts with results showing that representations for nonhuman animal species are based on part or attribute (i.e., featural) information-heads, in the case of cats versus dogs (Quinn, Eimas, & Tarr, 2001). These data on how infants represent humans correspond with the finding that expert object recognition by adults is characterized by holistic-configural processing (Gauthier & Tarr, 2002; but see Robbins & McKone, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The pictures were selected to be of approximately the same size. As a result, the infants were required to use cues such as shape, parts, or the pattern of correlation across the parts-cues that have been shown to be diagnostic of category membership for both infants and adults (Quinn et al, 2001;Rosch et al, 1976;Younger, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deselaers et al 2005;Epstein and Ullman 2005). But shape is also an important cue for object categorization, for instance humans do use shape by means of the objects silhouette to distinguish between categories even in early vision (Quinn et al 2001). Using shape instead of appearance is not novel but is less explored for the task of categorization.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%