2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
137
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, smooth surfaces have greater heat transport, causing a colder feeling when touching them [38]. This is in line with other studies, where rough materials are rated as more warm, soft and pleasant [39]. Wood is perceived as a rough material and therefore this perception might influence other psychological attributes such as warm, soft and pleasant attributes.…”
Section: Psychological Differences Between Wood and Laminatesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, smooth surfaces have greater heat transport, causing a colder feeling when touching them [38]. This is in line with other studies, where rough materials are rated as more warm, soft and pleasant [39]. Wood is perceived as a rough material and therefore this perception might influence other psychological attributes such as warm, soft and pleasant attributes.…”
Section: Psychological Differences Between Wood and Laminatesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Adjective texture dimensions other than roughness, hardness, and stickiness have been examined by other researchers, and these dimensions include soft/harsh, thin/thick, and relief and hardness (Picard et al 2003) or blur and clarity (Gescheider et al 2005). The relationship between the texture perceptual space, on the one hand, and roughness, hardness, and stickiness, on the other, is different in direct touch and indirect touch.…”
Section: Multidimensionality Of Texture Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other putative adjectives have been used to describe textures including "thin", "thick", "relief", "harsh" (Picard et al 2003), "blurred", and "clear" (Gescheider et al 2005), exactly how these descriptors relate to the primary dimensions is not clear. In the present study, we concentrate on the three primary dimensions of "hardness", "stickiness", and "roughness".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many studies in the psychophysics of texture and roughness perception unfortunately contribute little insight to the haptics engineer because these studies rarely speak of the same quantities, although there is a general agreement that roughness has perceptual significance [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], even if it is nearly impossible to define it unambiguously from the physical characteristics of the touched object [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%