2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) removal with Pd0/nFe0 nanoparticles: Adsorption or aqueous Fe-complexation, not transformation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection for PFOS, at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, is 0.15 pM, which is far lower than the most recent United States Environmental Protection Agency Provisional Health Advisory values (1.3 × 10 –10 M of PFOS for drinking water). 43 Moreover, the result is compared to that obtained by LC–MS and is lowest among the reported results by other sensors (Table 1).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The limit of detection for PFOS, at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, is 0.15 pM, which is far lower than the most recent United States Environmental Protection Agency Provisional Health Advisory values (1.3 × 10 –10 M of PFOS for drinking water). 43 Moreover, the result is compared to that obtained by LC–MS and is lowest among the reported results by other sensors (Table 1).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Meanwhile, increasing temperature to 60°C showed decomposition of PFAS by ZVI in the presence of PS, and formation of short‐chain PFAS was identified. Along with higher temperatures, the presence of PS accelerated oxidation of ZVI to Fe oxides and Fe hydroxides with high affinity for PFAS, which was supported by fast color change of the reaction solution to reddish brown (Parenky, Gevaerd de Souza, Asgari, et al, 2020; Park et al, 2018). Importantly, only the case of RAC in the presence of PS at 60°C exhibited reaction byproducts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Formation of Fe oxides and Fe hydroxides around core ZVI due to its oxidation has been reported (Choi et al, 2009). Higher temperatures are expected to rapidly oxidize ZVI to various Fe derivatives which also remove PFAS via either adsorption or complexation mechanism (Parenky, Gevaerd de Souza, Asgari, et al, 2020; Park et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those PFASs have high persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity, and has been ubiquitously detected in the global environmental and biological matrices [2,6], thus posing great risks to environment, biota and human health [7,8]. However, due to the extremely high stability of C-F bond (~116 kcal/mol, almost thestrongest in nature [2]), defluorination of PFASs is not an easy task [9][10][11]. Current advanced treatments include sonochemical destruction [12], electrochemical oxidation [13], radiochemical irradiation [14], microwave-hydrothermally induced persulfate oxidation [15], hydrated electron based photoreduction [16], elimination by zerovalent iron in subcritical water [17] and plasma chemical degradation [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%