2016 European Control Conference (ECC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2016.7810677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis and controller improvement for linear systems with (m, k)-firm data losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. θ s ( ) is also given by the eigenvalue of    = + : s s with the largest real part [6] (which can be shown to be real [28]). Derivatives of this dynamical free energy with respect to s can be used to obtain the activity (net count rate)…”
Section: K K Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. θ s ( ) is also given by the eigenvalue of    = + : s s with the largest real part [6] (which can be shown to be real [28]). Derivatives of this dynamical free energy with respect to s can be used to obtain the activity (net count rate)…”
Section: K K Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in such systems has grown with recent experimental progress in quantum optics and open quantum many-body systems [6][7][8][9], in particular from the point of view of dynamical phase transitions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and system identification [20,21]. [12], and through the thermodynamics of jump trajectories [22][23][24][25]; the large deviations approach to quantum phase transitions exploits both these features to uncover dynamical phases [17,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such constraints on the data loss signal are often encountered in practice, and arise from the characteristics of the shared (wireless) communication network and/or the embedded architecture. Another type of constraints could be that for every m consecutive time steps, we receive data in good order on at least k time steps (so-called (m, k)-firmness), where m, k ∈ N are given parameters [9], [11], [29].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let us modify the constraint on the data loss signal. Consider the case where the control and communication system is constructed so as to protect itself against disruptions, for example, such that at most one packet can be lost in a period of m consecutive steps (or stated otherwise, at least m − 1 successful transmissions take place in every m steps, which is (m, m − 1)-firmness [29]. It turns out that in this case the system is observable (as soon as m ≥ 2).…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%