2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2019.2894771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis and Optimization of Liquid-Cooled and Flywheel-Type Eddy Current Retarder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the optimized brake, a 40% cost reduction could be achieved compared with the reference eddy current brake. The improvement percentage in the optimized design also is in harmony with the recently published papers about the optimization of ECBs [32][33]. Nearly same reduction on the total mass and increase on braking torque are achieved in those studies.…”
Section: A Fea and Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…With the optimized brake, a 40% cost reduction could be achieved compared with the reference eddy current brake. The improvement percentage in the optimized design also is in harmony with the recently published papers about the optimization of ECBs [32][33]. Nearly same reduction on the total mass and increase on braking torque are achieved in those studies.…”
Section: A Fea and Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, due to the heat dissipation of nanofluid, the braking torque is maintained at about 403 N·m. The heat fade ratio of the proposed retarder's braking torque is only 8.2% under high‐power braking condition, which is lower than that of previous liquid‐cooled retarders reported by Ye et al, Jiao et al, Zhang et al, Guo et al, and Wang et al (see References [2–8]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, Jiao et al 4 proposed a liquid‐cooled ECR with a dual salient poles design. It was noticed that the braking torque decreased by 18.7%, 14.3%, and 6.9% in 10 min corresponding to applied coil voltages of 81.5, 41.7, and 30.9 V. Ye et al designed a water‐cooled permanent magnet retarder (PMR) for heavy vehicles in 2011 5 and a liquid‐cooled and flywheel‐type ECR in 2019 3 . It was reported that the braking torque of the water‐cooled PMR was only reduced by 10% and the temperature reached only 160°C in 5 min, while the heat fade ratio of the liquid‐cooled and flywheel‐type ECR braking torque was only 8.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEC is a simple analytical calculation method [15,16]. In recent years, it has been applied in the design of eddy current couplings [17] and retarders [18,19]. The authors of [20] use an analytical method to calculate the torque characteristics of a novel hybrid superconducting magnetic coupling with axial flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%