2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using tree-shaped designs for flow distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the model with N = 64 outlets produced a more uniform flow distribution at the lowest pressure drop and energy dissipation. The fractal system with 256 outlets was found to have the highest uniformity of the flow and consequently the current distribution (Ramos-Alvarado et al, 2011), but the overall PEMFC performance was lower than in the convenient parallel design (Fan et al, 2008;Lorenzini-Gutierrez et al, 2013;Ouellette et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fractal Type Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the model with N = 64 outlets produced a more uniform flow distribution at the lowest pressure drop and energy dissipation. The fractal system with 256 outlets was found to have the highest uniformity of the flow and consequently the current distribution (Ramos-Alvarado et al, 2011), but the overall PEMFC performance was lower than in the convenient parallel design (Fan et al, 2008;Lorenzini-Gutierrez et al, 2013;Ouellette et al, 2018).…”
Section: Fractal Type Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study suggests that an improved performance is achievable for a fractal design at higher temperatures, which do not involve removing water in the liquid phase. Fractal tree‐like flow fields are characterized by their branching structures, and the effects of one, two, and three levels of bifurcation in fractal flow channels are reported by Lorenzini et al [ 45 ] The results reveal that an increase in the level of bifurcation substantially improves the peak power density, exhibiting a 25.25% increase for three‐level versus one‐level bifurcation fractal design. Aside from the level of bifurcation, there are other important parameters to be taken into account for optimal designing of fractal flow fields.…”
Section: Flow Field Designmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Researchers have enumerated multiple advantages of using www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advenergysustres.com bioinspired flow fields and compared their performance characteristics with other conventional flow field designs. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] The flow field design is an intricate process that has to keep different factors and parameters in consideration to achieve optimal performance, such as the minimization of material requirement, uniform distribution of gases, effective water transport, and manufacturability. [51,52] Mathematical models are extensively used to predict the functionality of different components in a similarly simulated environment or operating conditions using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).…”
Section: Flow Field Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He found that based on this flow field, PEMFC power density was 55.82% higher than that with parallel flow channels and 27.13% higher than that with single serpentine flow channels [12]. Lorenzini-Gutierrez et al proposed that the increase in the number of the flow field branches enables the improvement in the flow distribution uniformity and the reduction in the pressure drop between the inlet and outlet of flow channels [13]. Kang et al conducted experiments comparing the performance of the leaf flow channels based on the ginkgo and dicotyledonous leaf structures, the parallelstyle flow channels, and the serpentine-style flow channels [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%