2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/citsm50537.2020.9268789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Black Hole Attack and Flooding Attack AODV Routing Protocol on VANET (Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These bots will randomly generate packets of 5 MB to 25 MB to be sent to the target node. Furthermore, the Adhoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) [26,27] routing protocol was employed to facilitate traffic routing. In NS-3, a channel connects a node, and in this simulation, the channel selected is a point-to-point channel.…”
Section: Figure 1 Simulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bots will randomly generate packets of 5 MB to 25 MB to be sent to the target node. Furthermore, the Adhoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) [26,27] routing protocol was employed to facilitate traffic routing. In NS-3, a channel connects a node, and in this simulation, the channel selected is a point-to-point channel.…”
Section: Figure 1 Simulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows a comparison of the SBGM mechanism with other existing methodologies for detecting the black hole and gray hole attack against various comparison metrics. Since the SBGM mechanism is for dual attack mitigation (black and gray), similar existing solutions in the VANET scenario are limited [46]. Hence, existing schemes in MANET is considered for comparison.…”
Section: Complexity Analysis and Comparison Of Proposed Sbgm Mechanism With The Existing Solutions Against Black Hole And Gray Hole Attacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 describes the randomness of the nodes' movements, which often results in partitioning the network's connections. This primarily impacts the nodes in between [10] [11]. Compared to BGP, MANETs suffer from greater packet loss due to variables including concealed terminals that create wireless channel problems (high BER), collisions, frequent breaks, and interference in routes caused by node mobility [12][13] [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%