2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4859-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Different Models for Twitter Sentiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the non-convexity of the optimization problem, CSGMs outperform conventional sparsity-based compressed sensing solvers on relatively simple source distributions such as human face images (Liu et al, 2015). Theoretical analysis and improvement have been reported by Joshi et al (2021) whereas the techniques of inverting the generative models have been investigated in (Creswell and Bharath, 2018;Lei et al, 2019;Asim et al, 2020;Jalal et al, 2021).…”
Section: Compressed Sensing Using Generative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the non-convexity of the optimization problem, CSGMs outperform conventional sparsity-based compressed sensing solvers on relatively simple source distributions such as human face images (Liu et al, 2015). Theoretical analysis and improvement have been reported by Joshi et al (2021) whereas the techniques of inverting the generative models have been investigated in (Creswell and Bharath, 2018;Lei et al, 2019;Asim et al, 2020;Jalal et al, 2021).…”
Section: Compressed Sensing Using Generative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%